Archdiocese of Washington Removes Prominent Exorcist Over Remarks Linking UFOs to Demonic Activity
Monsignor Stephen Rossetti, a priest from the Diocese of Syracuse, was removed from his role as archdiocesan exorcist by Cardinal Robert McElroy. The Archdiocese also severed ties with the St. Michael Center for Spiritual Renewal, a nonprofit led by Rossetti. The removal followed a YouTube video in which Rossetti claimed many UFO sightings are demons, a statement that the cardinal said undermined the Church’s teachings on the devil and exorcism. Rossetti apologized for his remarks and pledged to remain obedient to Church doctrine.
4 months ago
The Archdiocese of Washington dismissed Monsignor Stephen Rossetti from his role as the archdiocesan exorcist after he publicly linked unidentified aerial phenomena (UFOs) to demonic activity. Cardinal Robert McElroy said the priest’s remarks and the St. Michael Center’s recent social‑media use “gravely undermine” the Church’s precise teaching on the devil, demons and exorcism, prompting both Rossetti’s removal and the severing of the archdiocese’s affiliation with the Center. Rossetti expressed sorrow, asked forgiveness for any deviation from magisterial doctrine, and pledged obedience while indicating the Center will continue its ministry elsewhere.
Cardinal Robert McElroy announced on June 3 that Monsignor Stephen Rossetti was “removed … as an exorcist of the Archdiocese of Washington” 1 2 3 4 5.
The decision was accompanied by a statement that the archdiocese “ended all affiliation between the archdiocese and the Saint Michael Center for Spiritual Renewal” 1 4.
Rossetti had posted a You‑Tube video on May 29 in which he asserted that “many, if not most, UFO sightings are, in fact, demons” and that demonic entities can perform feats beyond human ability 1 2 3 4 5.
McElroy judged those comments to “gravely undermine the Church’s very precise teaching on the devil, demons and exorcism” 1 2 4.
The cardinal also cited concerns about the Center’s “recent use of social media,” though no further details were given 1 4.
In a follow‑up statement, Rossetti said he was “saddened” by the decision and asked forgiveness for any failure to remain faithful to the Magisterium 1 2 3 4 5.
He reaffirmed his commitment to obedience, thanked the archdiocese for 19 years of support, and urged others to “stay in the Boat” (the barque of Peter) 4 5.
Rossetti indicated that the St. Michael Center will “continue its ministry elsewhere” 1 3 5.
The video addressed renewed public interest in extraterrestrial life following the U.S. Department of Defense’s release of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) files in early May 2026 4.
Rossetti acknowledged that belief in alien life is not incompatible with Catholic faith, but personally expressed doubt and warned that demons could masquerade as UFOs to deceive people 4 5.
He quoted Ephesians 6:12‑13 to emphasize spiritual warfare against “principalities, powers and rulers of this present darkness” 4.
The Catholic Church has no definitive doctrinal position on extraterrestrial life; theologians regard the question as open to scientific and philosophical inquiry 4.
Church teaching affirms the existence of Satan and demons as fallen angels, subject to God’s authority, and reserves the rite of major exorcism for priests expressly appointed by the local bishop 4.
Thus, while the Church acknowledges demonic activity, it does not equate UFO reports with demonic manifestations 4.
The case highlights the tension between personal theological speculation and official magisterial teaching, especially in the digital age where clergy can reach large audiences instantly 5.
It also underscores the archdiocese’s responsibility to safeguard doctrinal clarity and to manage the public perception of Church ministries such as exorcism 5.
Investigate Catholic doctrine on demonic activity and modern phenomena
Catholic doctrine affirms a real personal presence of Satan and demons, but it also insists on prudence, sobriety, and discernment when modern claims of “demonic activity” arise—especially when phenomena could also have psychological, medical, or purely natural explanations.
The Catechism teaches that Satan (the devil) and the other demons are fallen angels who “have freely refused to serve God and his plan,” and that they try to associate human beings with their revolt against God.
It also teaches that this evil did not come from God’s creation. Rather, Satan was “at first a good angel,” made by God, and became evil “by their own doing.”
Within the Church’s teaching, the devil’s activity is not depicted primarily as “spectacle,” but as a threat to human life of faith and worship—working through temptation, deception, and opposition to God’s plan. The Catechism describes a key method: demons seek to draw people into revolt, thereby undermining the human person’s relationship with God.
The Catechism also connects demonic reality to the broader moral-religious issue of idolatry: idolatry includes honoring or revering a creature “in place of God,” including “demons (for example, satanism).”
Catholic moral doctrine does not treat “occult knowledge” as neutral. It explicitly warns that:
This matters for modern phenomena because many “signs” circulated today (viral videos, alleged psychic readings, online “spiritual warfare” content, etc.) often function as a pathway into divination, superstition, or magical thinking, all of which the Church explicitly rejects.
A major danger in modern culture is the opposite error: reducing everything unknown to demons, or turning demonology into an obsession. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) emphasizes:
Pope Francis echoes this pastoral prudence with a clear boundary: it is “practically impossible…to reach, in individual cases, the certainty that it is truly him” because humans cannot precisely know where the devil’s action ends and their own evil begins.
Catholic teaching describes exorcism in terms of Christ’s victory and liberation from demonic domination. The Catechism states that Jesus’ exorcisms “free some individuals from the domination of demons,” anticipating His “great victory.”
But the Church also regulates exorcism strictly. A major theme in modern culture—films, sensational media, and rumor—can distort what exorcism is and what it is for. The CDF warns against turning redemption into “a message of terror” and insists the Church’s approach is not credulous; it is critically discerning.
The USCCB explains that exorcisms are in two forms:
It also clarifies that a major exorcism is reserved for cases of “genuine demonic possession,” where it is determined the devil can exercise dominion over the person.
The USCCB further stresses that exorcists must balance not believing too easily that the devil is responsible, while not attributing everything solely to natural causes. It advises a process that should include medical and mental health evaluation.
The key procedural point is explicit: before concluding demonic possession, a thorough examination—including medical, psychological, and psychiatric testing—should occur. The “actual determination” is made by the Church, even if individuals self-diagnose.
This is directly relevant to “modern phenomena,” because many contemporary claims of oppression or possession are produced in the intersection of spiritual language with trauma, mental illness, addiction, and internet-driven suggestion. Catholic discernment therefore requires both spiritual seriousness and intellectual humility.
The CDF’s 1985 letter on norms on exorcism requires special caution:
So, even where people feel genuine fear, the Church’s framework prevents “spiritual experiments” or improvised confrontations with demons outside ecclesial authority.
Pope Francis gives a striking contemporary diagnosis: when faith is driven out, the devil “re-entered…through the window” via superstition—and, he says, if you are superstitious “you are unconsciously conversing with the devil.”
He explains a practical spiritual rule: Jesus does not “converse with the devil”; rather, He casts him out or condemns him. Therefore, Christians should raise the heart to the Lord, pray to Our Lady, and banish temptations rather than engage them in dialogue.
Pope Francis explicitly mentions modern technology as offering “countless means to ‘give an opportunity to the devil,’” and he identifies online pornography as a widespread trap of the devil at work.
This is doctrinally consistent with the Church’s general teaching: demonic activity is understood primarily as engagement with sin, temptation, and deception, not as a guarantee of dramatic signs.
From Catholic doctrine, the safest approach is:
Catholic doctrine affirms that Satan and demons are real fallen angels who actively oppose God’s plan, but it simultaneously teaches that believers must respond with faith without superstition, and with prudence without denial.