Australia’s incredible solution to Catholic school renewal
Spiritus, an Australian Catholic University initiative, trains educators and school leaders to renew Catholic schools as centers of evangelization. The program combines theological and spiritual formation, leadership development, and practical strategies for mission. Spiritus emphasizes youth leading youth and school staff witnessing to and leading in the faith. Program evaluations found that most participants deepened their understanding of evangelization and their ability to lead schools in that mission. The initiative is expanding internationally, with programs reaching Catholic educators in multiple countries.
před 4 hodinami
Spiritus, an Australian Catholic University program, aims to renew Catholic schools as centers of evangelization by forming educators in faith, leadership, and practical approaches to mission. The initiative began in 2017 and now operates across several regions, with participation growing internationally. 1
Run through the university’s La Salle Academy, Spiritus provides formation for teachers, school leaders, and Church ministry leaders. Its approach combines theological formation, spiritual renewal, leadership development, and practical strategies for school communities. 1
The program emphasizes two approaches: young people leading and evangelizing their peers, and staff bearing witness to their faith while helping lead the school’s mission. 1
According to evaluations cited by Spiritus director Peter Woods, 98% of participants gained a deeper understanding of evangelization, 95% felt more capable of leading schools as centers of evangelization, and 94% reported growth in vocation and ministry. 1
Since starting in 2017, Spiritus has involved educators and leaders in Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Europe, and East Africa. More than 400 participants completed its first two program parts in 2025, and the initiative works with dioceses, school systems, universities, and Church agencies. 1
Schools generally join through a diocesan or regional cohort, host a local program, use online offerings, or participate in an international formation experience. Spiritus is also developing pathways for trained local leaders to deliver the program in their own countries while staying connected to its international network. 1
The article identifies the 2027 International Leaders Conference in Sydney as an opportunity for educators to learn about Spiritus and connect with its wider network. 1*
Educator formation renews Catholic schools’ evangelizing mission
The headline expresses a central Catholic principle: a school renews its evangelizing mission not simply by adding religious activities, but by forming educators whose professional competence, faith, and care for students are integrated. The Congregation for Catholic Education describes this as formation of the “heart,” alongside continuing professional, theological, and spiritual formation. Because no article details accompany the headline, it is possible to assess this principle, but not to judge any particular program or initiative.
In Catholic understanding, educators are not merely delivering lessons within a religious setting. Their teaching can itself become a way of transmitting the Gospel—through what they teach, how they teach, and the attention they give to students. The Congregation puts the connection directly:
Catholic educators need «a “formation of the heart”: they need to be led to that encounter with God in Christ which awakens their love and opens their spirits to others», so that their educational commitment becomes «a consequence deriving from their faith, a faith which becomes active through love (cf. Gal 5:6)».
This “formation of the heart” does not mean replacing education with sentiment or treating professional skill as unimportant. It means that educators’ service should arise from a Christian vision of the person and be animated by love. In this way, instruction can become a “school of faith”: not only by explicitly teaching the faith, but by making its concern for truth, human dignity, and loving service visible in the life of the school.
The Church’s guidance calls for educators to keep their subject knowledge and teaching methods up to date, because both society and the educational challenges facing young people change. Initial training alone is not enough; formation is meant to continue throughout an educator’s career and to be pursued both personally and in common with colleagues.
But professional development alone cannot accomplish the Catholic school’s distinctive mission. Educators are asked to bring faith, culture, and life into conversation, integrating human knowledge in the light of the Gospel while helping students grow in virtue and humanity. That requires attention not just to students’ academic progress, but to their development as persons.
The 2014 document Educating Today and Tomorrow makes a related point about credibility: in a rapidly changing culture, teacher formation needs rigor and depth if Catholic education is to remain trustworthy and its evangelical identity to be meaningfully lived. The goal is not a divided staff in which some carry the school’s Catholic mission while others are detached from it, but a community able to understand and share the school’s educational purpose.
Theological formation helps educators understand the truths of the faith and the principles of Christian life; spiritual formation deepens their relationship with Christ. The 2007 guidance presents these as connected to professional commitment: the aim is not simply to impart religious information, but to shape educators and their community more fully in the likeness of Christ, the Master. It also identifies Scripture, Tradition—especially liturgical and sacramental life—and the Church’s teaching as sources that continually nourish the Catholic school’s identity.
This balance matters. If formation were only technical, it could improve classroom methods without clarifying what the school ultimately believes education is for. If it were only devotional, it could neglect the demanding intellectual and pedagogical work students deserve. The Church’s vision brings these dimensions together: knowledgeable and capable teaching, informed by faith and sustained by spiritual life.
The guidance for lay educators likewise says that religious formation should continue beyond basic education and be proportionate to adult faith, culture, and vocation. It links formation both to personal holiness and to apostolic mission, and points to doctrinal preparation—including theology, ethics, philosophy, and Catholic social teaching—as relevant to educators’ work.
The headline’s emphasis on educator formation should not imply that the mission rests on individual teachers alone. Catholic education is described as a shared mission among lay and consecrated educators, requiring common formation, exchange, and cooperation. In schools connected with religious institutes, consecrated educators may contribute the spirituality and charism of their communities; the document also emphasizes sharing the fruits of that formation with lay colleagues.
Nor is the school meant to be isolated from the wider Church. The 2022 instruction says the educational mission can and should be enriched through communion with the parish, diocese, ecclesial movements, and universal Church. It calls for initial and continuing formation that helps educators face contemporary educational challenges, renew their methods, and remain open to spiritual and religious formation and shared learning.
Taken as a general claim, “Educator formation renews Catholic schools’ evangelizing mission” is well supported by the Church’s teaching: formation helps educators teach credibly, unite faith with learning and life, and make the school’s Gospel identity visible in its educational practice. The idea of “renewal” includes both ongoing adaptation to new circumstances and renewed grounding in the school’s Christian purpose.
That does not mean every school program described as formation will necessarily achieve those aims. The headline alone does not say who organized the formation, what it included, whether educators participated, or what effects it had. The Catholic sources establish the rationale and desired character of such formation; they do not provide evidence about the outcome of a specific initiative.