Cardinal Pizzaballa Delivers Easter Message of Hope at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre
Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, delivered a poignant Easter homily at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. He emphasized that the resurrection of Christ serves as a profound challenge to human certainties and routine religious expectations. The empty tomb was presented not as a symbol of absence, but as a powerful proclamation of God's freedom and a new form of existence. Furthermore, the Cardinal addressed the ongoing violence in the Holy Land, cautioning that hatred acts as a stone that traps the faithful in darkness. Ultimately, the message encouraged believers to look beyond their own limitations to find the living presence of the Risen One.
1 day ago
Examine the Resurrection’s role in redefining faith amid conflict
The Resurrection redefines faith in conflict by changing its content (Christ’s victory over death), its stance (hope that does not collapse under suffering), and its mission (a renewed way of living that contests evil with the weapons of truth, justice, mercy, and forgiveness).
Christian faith is not merely an emotional response to crisis, nor a vague optimism. Paul insists that the Resurrection is the decisive “good news” that believers received, in which they stand, and through which they are being saved, provided they “hold firmly” to it. If Christ is not raised, then proclamation and belief are “in vain” and people remain “in your sins.” In other words, in conflict—where fear and doubt are intensified—the Resurrection functions as the dividing line between a faith that collapses and a faith that endures.
The Catechism states this precisely in two movements:
So the Resurrection redefines faith by grounding it in an encounter with a real event that is also more than an event of ordinary history. This matters in conflict, because conflict often tempts believers to reduce faith either to (a) sentimental hopes, or (b) unstable assumptions detached from real testimony.
Disputes in the Gospels show that conflict can distort interpretation. The Sadducees (who deny resurrection) question Jesus, and he answers that they are “wrong,” because they “know neither the scriptures nor the power of God.” He then points them to God as “not of the dead, but of the living.”
That is a fundamental redefinition: under conflict, the temptation is to think God’s power has run out—especially when death, persecution, or institutional hostility seem final. Jesus rejects that reading by asserting that the divine power that acts in creation and covenant also reaches beyond death.
John 11 dramatizes the same dynamic pastorally. Martha speaks in terms that may be understandable under grief (“he will rise again in the resurrection on the last day”), but Jesus reveals something more immediate and personal: “I am the resurrection and the life.” He then asks, “Do you believe this?” In conflict, this question becomes the core: faith is redefined from a timetable of possibilities into a personal reliance on Christ who conquers death.
If the Resurrection only denied death, conflict might simply be postponed. But the Church’s Easter teaching insists on a more demanding claim: Easter does not erase the cross; it defeats it. Pope Leo XIV describes it as the transformation of the “Via Crucis” (Way of the Cross) into the “Via Lucis” (Way of Light), emphasizing that Christ “defeats” the cross in a “miraculous duel” that changed human history. “Easter does not eliminate the cross, but defeats it,” and even times marked by “so many crosses” are “invok[ing] the dawn of Paschal hope.”
Pope Benedict XVI similarly stresses that Easter does not “work magic.” The Church after the Resurrection “always finds history filled with joy and hope, grief and anguish,” but “this history is changed” and “open to the future.” In other words, Resurrection hope is real, yet it remains compatible with ongoing hardship. That is why it can operate amid conflict rather than collapsing when conflict continues.
Paul’s argument is not abstract. He turns it into exhortation: “Therefore… be steadfast, immovable… always excelling in the work of the Lord, because you know that in the Lord your labor is not in vain.” This is Resurrection-shaped resilience: conflict tests whether one can keep doing good when outcomes look delayed or meaningless.
Benedict XVI connects this directly to persecution and violence. Easter “communicates the hope… especially where Christians suffer persecution because of their faith and their commitment to justice and peace,” and it “summons people to joy” while recognizing that evil still leaves “many… signs of its former dominion.” Yet Christians are not asked to fight despair; they are invited to fight with a different moral logic rooted in the Resurrection.
Resurrection redefinition is also ethical and social. In Benedict XVI’s Easter messages, the Resurrection is described as launching a “peaceful battle” that must be affirmed using “the weapons of justice and truth, mercy, forgiveness and love.” These are not optional virtues; they are portrayed as instruments of Christ’s victory in history.
Benedict XVI’s Easter 2010 message applies this to concrete conflict zones and global crises: he prays for wars to end, for reconciliation, and for leaders to adopt criteria of “truth, justice and fraternal aid.” He also entrusts persecuted Christians and asks the Risen Lord to sustain dialogue and “serene coexistence.” The Resurrection, therefore, is not limited to private belief; it reorients how the Church seeks peace amid conflict—through moral transformation and commitment to reconciliation.
Benedict XVI (Easter 2012) describes how the disciples’ hope seemed doomed at the cross—“for a moment Jesus seemed vanquished”—but then faith is “born anew… invincible since it is based on a decisive experience.” The Resurrection is presented as victory of “life over death” and “mercy over vengeance,” and the Risen One is “present today, alive,” not confined to the past.
This has two conflict-relevant effects:
A common conflict pattern—especially in ideologically charged contexts—is to demand that faith either (a) prove everything by purely historical methods or (b) abandon historical reasoning altogether. The Catechism’s formulation helps avoid both reductionisms: the Resurrection is tied to disciples who encountered the Risen One, yet it transcends ordinary categories because it is Christ’s humanity entering divine glory.
That combination matters for redefinition: believers are not told that reality is unknowable; rather, reality is known in a way that includes both testimony and mystery.
In conflict, the Resurrection redefines faith by making it anchored and durable (Paul’s insistence that if Christ is not raised, faith collapses), interpreting grief through divine power (Jesus correcting denial of resurrection), and turning suffering into transfigured hope (Easter defeats the cross without denying its pain). It further shapes the Church’s response to violence: Christians are called to affirm Christ’s victory through “justice and truth, mercy, forgiveness and love,” and to pursue reconciliation rather than resignation.