On centenary of Cristero War, bishop invites Catholics to ‘defend your faith by knowing it better’
Bishop Sigifredo Noriega Barceló of Zacatecas urges Catholics to deepen their knowledge of faith to defend it on the centenary of the Cristero War The Cristero War began in 1926 after President Calles enforced anticlerical provisions of the 1917 constitution, sparking persecution of Catholics The Mexican Bishops’ Conference reports more than 200,000 martyrs—including children, peasants, priests, and laypeople—during the conflict The bishop frames remembrance of the war as a call for education and active defense of Catholic beliefs The article covers the centenary commemoration and the bishop’s message to the faithful
1 day ago
The Catholic Church in Mexico marks the 100‑year anniversary of the Cristero War by urging believers to deepen their understanding of the faith so they can defend religious freedom without resorting to violence, a message delivered by Bishop Sigifredo Noriega of Zacatecas 1 2.
The Cristero War (1926‑1929), also called the “Cristiada,” began after President Plutarco Elías Calles enforced the anticlerical articles of the 1917 Constitution through the Calles Law. 1 2
In response, Mexican bishops suspended public worship on 31 July 1926, prompting intensified government persecution of Catholics. 1 2
The Mexican Bishops’ Conference estimates more than 200,000 martyrs—children, peasants, clergy, and laypeople—lost their lives defending their faith. 1 2
Speaking at the 120th plenary assembly of Mexican bishops (13‑17 April 2026), Bishop Noriega called the faithful to “defend your faith by knowing it better.” 1 2
He noted that many today lack solid religious principles and stressed the need for stronger formation in both doctrine and the nation’s history. 1 2
The bishop urged Catholics to use this knowledge to prevent a repeat of past conflicts, so that arms will never again be needed to protect religious liberty. 1 2
The Church is undertaking a “plan to recover the memory” of the Cristero War, aiming to reflect on its significance then and its relevance now. 1 2
This effort seeks to honor those who sacrificed their lives and to inspire contemporary believers to uphold the values that defined the martyrs. 1 2
By encouraging deeper catechesis, the bishop hopes to solidify the religious principles that guide daily life. 1 2
He envisions a Mexico where religious freedom is defended through informed witness rather than armed resistance. 1 2
Noriega called for admiration and remembrance of the individuals who gave their lives, emphasizing that their courage touched both belief and the very depth of human existence. 1 2
Explore how the Cristero War shaped Catholic identity in Mexico
The Cristero War (often called the Cristiada) did not merely involve Catholics resisting violence in early 20th-century Mexico; it helped form a durable Catholic identity—defined by fidelity to Church authority, attachment to the sacraments and public worship, a conception of religious liberty, and a strongly communal lay spirituality that later became a “backbone” for organized Catholic action.
In the Cristero context, Church and society did not simply disagree on policy; Catholics experienced a direct assault on what they understood as the Church’s freedom to worship and to govern worship according to divine and ecclesial law. The bishops’ response—suspending public worship rather than submitting Catholic worship to state control—made Catholic identity visible in a radical way: the Church would not trade communion with the Church for governmental control, even at immense cost.
Pope Pius XI interprets the crisis as one that would have reduced the Church to the “despotism of the State and of the Government hostile to the Catholic religion,” and he praises the bishops’ firmness, their call to “efficacious protest,” and the courage of priests and faithful who endured exile, persecution, and martyrdom.
One of the most identity-shaping outcomes of the Cristero War was the clear link between Catholic identity and public worship understood as belonging to the Church, not to the state. According to the Dicastery for the Causes of Saints biography of José Sánchez del Río, Mexican bishops decided to “close public worship” rather than accept the creation of a “national Church” controlled by the State and operating under conditions the State imposed—such as limitations on priests and how ministry would be exercised.
Pius XI echoes the same interpretation: the bishops “determined… to suspend public worship” while calling the faithful to protest the government’s unjust procedure.
Importantly, this resistance is not portrayed as hostility to legitimate political order as such; it is framed as defense of the Church’s rights and unity. Pius XI emphasizes the Catholics’ steadfastness “rather than cut themselves off from the unity of the Church or refuse obedience to this Apostolic See.”
So the Cristero War shaped Catholic identity by teaching—through suffering—that one’s “Catholic position” is not only doctrinal, but also visibly ecclesial: remaining united to the Church even when the state demands separation or submission.
A defining trait of Catholic identity after the Cristero experience was the sense that the Church’s sacramental life is worth everything. Pius XI records admiration for the “courage displayed by the clergy in administering the Sacraments to the faithful, amid a thousand dangers and at the risk of their lives,” and for “the like heroism of many of the faithful,” who assisted priests at enormous cost.
This directly shaped identity in two ways:
The biography of José Sánchez del Río emphasizes the national Catholic flag/cry at execution: “Long live Christ the King and Saint Mary of Guadalupe,” illustrating that Catholic identity in this period fused Christological kingship, devotion, and Marian communion in a public, communal form.
Meanwhile Pius XI’s broader framing presents a theology of endurance: Catholics remained firm in resisting persecution’s demands “in all patience,” trusting that the Church would ultimately find respite from the “tempest of hatred,” because “the gates of hell shall not prevail.”
In other words, martyrdom and endurance taught that Catholic identity is credible when it costs something—without abandoning faith, unity, or obedience to the Church.
Later Catholic reflection (including that connected to beatifications of Cristero martyrs) helps show how Catholic identity in Mexico came to understand religious freedom not as mere political tolerance, but as protection of conscience. In the beatification homily for José Sánchez del Río, Cardinal José Saraiva Martins cites Dignitatis humanae:
“this freedom consists in that all men… [are] immune from coercion, whether by individuals or social groups or any human power… so that, in matters religious, no one is to be forced to act against his conscience… and no one is to be prevented from acting according to his conscience… in private and in public… alone or in association with others” (Dignitatis humanae, 2).
The homily then interprets the martyrs’ response as defense of this right “peacefully… even with their own blood,” insisting they sought the “pacific and conciliatory” path that would recognize rights denied to Mexican Catholics.
This matters for identity: the Cristero experience shaped Catholics to see themselves as defenders of religious liberty precisely without inflaming hatred, and—at least as presented in the beatification framing—as agents who could become “factors of unity” in a divided people (contrasted with others who sought different paths).
Thus, the war contributed to an identity in which religious freedom is:
Pius XI praises “Catholic laity” who, in obedience and zeal, “have written glorious pages in the recent history of the Church in Mexico,” urging them to continue defending the Church’s rights with “generous abnegation.”
This emphasis supports a key identity shift: Catholics increasingly understood themselves not only as individuals who happen to believe, but as organized members of the Church—able to endure, to protest, and to maintain worship and formation even when structures are attacked.
Decades later, Pope John Paul II, speaking to Mexican Catholic organizations in 1979, explicitly recalls Mexican Catholic Action as the “backbone of the organized laity” and frames the Mexican laity as called to renewed fidelity to the Magisterium and unity with pastors.
John Paul II describes the kind of mature Catholic identity that grows from such history: believers are to be “staunch in their faith,” “certain in the doctrine proposed by the authentic Magisterium,” “firm and active in the Church,” and nourished by the sacraments; they should be “constant promoters of peace and justice,” with “critical discernment” in light of the social teaching of the Church.
In this way, the Cristero War’s crisis becomes, in Church memory, part of the foundation for a later identity that is both faithful and engaged—not abandoning doctrine or ecclesial communion after persecution, but channeling the struggle into organized apostolic life.
Pius XI’s later reflection also shows how Catholic identity was shaped emotionally and spiritually: he says that, “in contrast to… apostasies and weaknesses,” the resistance to evil and the “frank profession of faith” of the Mexican faithful consoles him and generates hope that the Mexican Church—re-animated by “so much heroism” and sustained by prayers and sacrifices—“cannot perish… it must flourish again.”
This means that the Cristero War shaped identity not only through memory of suffering, but through a promise of renewal: Catholic identity in Mexico came to understand perseverance as fertile ground for future flourishing.
From the Church sources above, the Cristero War shaped Catholic identity in Mexico in four tightly interwoven ways:
In short, the Cristero War became a kind of “identity crucible” in which Mexican Catholic faith was not only professed, but enacted—through worship defended, sacraments preserved, conscience protected, and communion with the Church maintained despite persecution.