Former Vatican auditor general Libero Milone discussed his ongoing legal case against the Vatican alleging unfair dismissal and reputational damage. Milone oversaw financial work with the late Cardinal George Pell, uncovering financial irregularities and unaccounted-for sums of money. He emphasized that the soundness of Vatican finances is crucial for the continuation of the Church. Milone claims he was forced to resign after two years in the role after uncovering evidence of fraud, allegedly due to pressure from Cardinal Angelo Becciu. The Vatican dismissed his initial complaint, arguing that any actions by Becciu were personal rather than official, and accused Milone of failing to keep his resignation reasons confidential.
about 9 hours ago
Former Vatican auditor general Libero Milone is pursuing a final appeal in his case against the Vatican, alleging unfair dismissal, loss of earnings, and reputational damage.1
The initial complaint was dismissed, with the Vatican claiming Cardinal Angelo Becciu acted personally, not officially.1
Milone asserts no evidence document from a supposed seven-month investigation has been provided after eight years.1
Appointed by Pope Francis alongside Cardinal George Pell, Milone audited Vatican finances for two years starting around 2015.1
A former Deloitte executive, he was tasked with examining balance sheets and ensuring accountability.1
He resigned suddenly in 2017, claiming pressure from Becciu after uncovering irregularities.1
Milone identified issues in APSA's payment systems, allowing funds to be redirected post-transfer without record.1
He reported a suspicious 2.5 million euro transfer to a hospital in 10 installments of 250,000 euros each, where no ward was built despite funds entering and leaving the account.1
Over two years, he flagged 15 issues to the AIF money laundering authority and promoter of justice, receiving minimal responses.1
The Vatican accused Milone of breaching resignation confidentiality but has not commented on recent requests.1
Milone views this silence as embarrassment over institutional misconduct.1
He emphasizes transparency's importance: sound finances ensure the Church's continuity.1
Pope Leo XIV recently stated Vatican finances show a 2024 surplus of 60 million euros, downplaying crisis claims.1
Milone worries the Pope may lack full information due to hidden issues, noting undisclosed consolidated statements signal problems.1
He seeks a meeting with Leo XIV to discuss challenges for financial soundness.1
Milone remains optimistic, believing truth will prevail if documents are properly reviewed.1
Rejection of his final Vatican appeal would end internal proceedings.1
Investigate canonical procedures for auditor dismissal in the Vatican
Auditors in the Vatican primarily refer to officials within the Roman Curia, such as the Auditors of the Sacra Romana Rota (a key appellate tribunal), the Auditor General (overseeing financial audits), and historically the Auditor Papae or Auditor of the Apostolic Camera. These roles constitute ecclesiastical offices, subject to the Code of Canon Law (CIC) provisions on their conferral, tenure, and loss. No single canon prescribes a unique dismissal procedure exclusively for Vatican auditors; instead, general norms on ecclesiastical offices apply, supplemented by Curial-specific regulations like Praedicate Evangelium (2022). Removal typically requires grave or just causes, follows due process, and must be formally communicated.
Vatican auditors serve in judicial, financial, or advisory capacities:
Auditors of the Sacra Romana Rota: These are senior officials appointed by the Pope on the recommendation of the College of Auditors. They deliberate collegially (often in groups of three or in pleno), prepare reports (ponens or relator), and issue decisions by majority vote, with appeals possible between commissions. Historically evolving from papal chaplains in the 13th century, their role has shifted from broad jurisdiction to specialized ecclesiastical cases, beatifications, canonizations, and precedence disputes.
Auditor General: Established under Praedicate Evangelium (Art. 224), this office conducts audits on financial anomalies, irregularities, contracts, corruption, or fraud at the request of bodies like the Council for the Economy. The Auditor General can initiate audits independently (notifying the Cardinal Coordinator) and handles whistleblower notifications. This is a modern financial oversight role, distinct from judicial auditors.
Other Historical Auditors: The Auditor Papae advised on consistorial matters and later handled limited ecclesiastical affairs; the Auditor General of the Camera managed appeals and penalties but saw powers curtailed over time.
Appointments are papal or by competent Curial authority, often for indefinite or fixed terms, making them ecclesiastical offices under CIC governance.
The CIC outlines standardized ways ecclesiastical offices—including those of Vatican auditors—are lost or terminated (Can. 184 §1): lapse of predetermined time, reaching mandatory age, resignation, transfer, removal, or privation. The office does not lapse merely due to the conferring authority's expiration unless law specifies otherwise (Can. 184 §2). Loss must be publicized to those with rights to the office (Can. 184 §3).
Automatic Removal (Ipso Iure): Occurs by force of law without decree for: (1) loss of clerical state; (2) public defection from Catholic faith or Church communion; (3) clerical attempt at marriage (even civil). Nos. 2–3 require declaration by competent authority for enforcement (Can. 194). This applies universally to clerics holding Vatican auditor roles.
Removal for Grave or Just Causes:
| Office Type | Procedure | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Indefinite term (common for senior Curial roles) | Removal only for grave causes, per law-defined process. Decree must be in writing to take effect. | Grave cause (e.g., misconduct); due process. |
| Definite term | Removal before term ends requires grave cause (exception: certain vicars, Can. 624 §3). | Same as above. |
| Conferred at competent authority's prudent discretion (e.g., many Curial appointments) | Removable by same authority for just cause. | Just cause; authority's judgment. |
| Transfer | Prior office vacates upon canonical possession of new office; remuneration continues interim (Can. 191). | Automatic upon possession, unless otherwise prescribed. |
No sources detail a bespoke Vatican tribunal (e.g., Rota self-adjudicating auditor dismissals); papal discretion prevails for high offices, aligned with CIC due process.
Sacra Romana Rota Auditors: As papal appointees, removal likely follows Can. 193 §3 (just cause by Pope). No unique procedure in sources; their judicial collegiality suggests internal review, but papal confirmation binds. Appeals exist within Rota structure.
Auditor General: Praedicate Evangelium defines functions but omits dismissal; general CIC applies, potentially with Curial statutes (e.g., transparency declarations for officials, barring fraud convictions) (cf. 2021 Motu Proprio).
Doctrinal/Academic Analogies: For teachers/consultors (some auditors serve as such), suspension/removal involves dialogue, council review, Chancellor/experts, with Holy See recourse; urgent cases allow interim suspension. Relators (pro auctore) defend in investigations.
Sources lack procedures for non-clerical or lay auditors, deferring to Curial norms (Praedicate Evangelium emphasizes transparency).
The provided sources emphasize grave/just causes and process, reflecting pastoral justice (e.g., St. John Paul II: juridical activity is inherently pastoral). No black-and-white ritual for Vatican auditors exists here; papal authority integrates CIC flexibility. Historical texts (1913) inform but yield to 1983 CIC and 2022 reforms. For unresolved cases (e.g., financial misconduct), Auditor General self-investigates others but not itself—escalation to Pope/Curia implied.
In summary, Vatican auditor dismissal follows CIC general norms: automatic for severe faults, discretionary removal for cause with written decree, prioritizing equity and notification. Consult current Curial statutes or Roman Rota for case-specifics.