Maltese singer Matthew Grech was acquitted after a three-year legal battle concerning Malta's ban on advertising 'conversion therapy'. Grech was accused because he shared his personal story in a media interview about abandoning a homosexual lifestyle following his Christian conversion. The judge ruled that Grech's interview constituted a personal expression of faith rather than an advertisement for conversion therapies. Malta was the first European country to ban practices aimed at changing sexual orientation in 2016. Grech and two media presenters faced potential prison time but were ultimately acquitted.
1 day ago
A Maltese court acquitted singer Matthew Grech on March 4, 2026, after a three-year trial stemming from a 2022 interview where he shared his journey from homosexuality to Christianity.1
The judge ruled that Grech's statements were a personal expression of faith, not advertising banned "conversion therapy," clearing him and two presenters of potential five-month prison sentences.1
Malta banned practices aimed at changing sexual orientation in 2016, the first in Europe.1
LGBT activists sued Grech following his "X Factor Malta" interview, where he described homosexuality as a sin one can repent from through faith, rejecting it as an identity.1
This marked the first international prosecution of its kind related to conversion practices.1
Grech, 36, emphasized that deeper Christian faith led him to abandon homosexual acts, viewing them as sins forgivable like others.1
He belongs to an evangelical church, volunteers with gay Christians pursuing chastity, and recently announced his engagement.1
Grech uses social media for evangelism, highlighting biblical transformation for homosexuals.1
Grech thanked God on Facebook, calling the verdict a win for sharing personal transformation through Christ.1
He criticized Malta's law as a tool against free speech and urged its repeal, warning of its use to silence Christian views on sexuality.1
The Catholic Church deems homosexual acts "intrinsically disordered" but distinguishes them from the inclination, which is not sinful.1
It calls for chastity among those with same-sex attraction and acceptance without unjust discrimination.1
Investigate Catholic doctrine on sexual orientation and conversion therapy
The Catholic Church teaches that the homosexual inclination, while not a sin in itself, constitutes an objective disorder—a deviation from the natural order of human sexuality oriented toward marital complementarity between man and woman. This inclination represents "a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil," necessitating special pastoral concern to prevent any perception that acting on it is morally acceptable. As theologian Livio Melina explains, affirming this disorder is essential to avoid ambiguous compassion that might tolerate acts or despair of chastity, emphasizing instead the call to live chastity as all Christians are called. The Church's magisterium has consistently upheld this view since at least 1975, clarifying it against overly benign interpretations that might deem the inclination neutral or good.
Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered towards an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder.
This doctrine remains firm, as reaffirmed in recent clarifications on Fiducia supplicans, which explicitly reject any doctrinal shift and restate the perennial teaching on marriage as the exclusive union of man and woman open to life.
Homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered and gravely contrary to chastity, lacking the essential finality of sexual acts ordered to procreation within marriage. The Church lacks authority to bless unions presuming to be marriages or extra-marital sexual practices, as this would imply moral legitimacy. Persons with homosexual tendencies must be accepted with respect and compassion, avoiding unjust discrimination, but are called to chastity like all Christians.
Pastoral care emphasizes respect, compassion, and sensitivity toward persons with homosexual inclinations, promoting their human dignity, formation in chastity, and integration into Church life. In contexts where homosexuality faces legal persecution—such as imprisonment or violence—bishops prudently discern, prioritizing safety without altering doctrine. This approach underscores broader responsibilities like catechesis on social doctrine and defense of dignity, rejecting rushed responses. Recent documents stress no confusion with marriage doctrine, allowing non-liturgical blessings for individuals in irregular situations without validating their status.
The magisterium does not directly address "conversion therapy" (also termed reparative or reorientation therapy), but aligned scholarly reflections affirm the possibility of change in sexual orientation, challenging views of it as unalterably intrinsic to identity. Studies cited, including Robert Spitzer's 2003 research (once a gay activism proponent), show many participants shifting from predominantly homosexual to heterosexual orientations post-therapy, with subsequent confirmations. Longitudinal studies, like those by Jones and Yarhouse (2009), contradict claims that such efforts are harmful or impossible. Melina references therapeutic and pastoral initiatives supporting chastity or change.
The Church's anthropology implies no intrinsic immutability, as the inclination's disorder calls for healing toward natural ends. While not mandating therapy, these sources encourage pastoral strategies avoiding despair, including potential reorientation where sought voluntarily.
| Key Studies on Orientation Change (from Catholic-Aligned Scholarship) | Findings | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Spitzer (2003): 200 participants | Shift from exclusive/predominant homosexual to heterosexual orientation; opposes bans on change-focused therapy. | Archives of Sexual Behavior |
| Karten (Fordham dissertation) | Confirms Spitzer; therapy viable. | N/A |
| Jones & Yarhouse (2009) | Religiously mediated change possible, not inherently harmful. | APA Convention |
| Nicolosi (30+ years reparative therapy) | Successful cases toward heterosexual lifestyle. | Books: Reparative Therapy (2004) |
Catholic doctrine unequivocally teaches the homosexual inclination as objectively disordered, acts as gravely sinful, and chastity as the path for those affected, with pastoral respect paramount. On conversion therapy, while magisterial silence persists, scholarly sources faithful to Church teaching support its potential efficacy, aligning with an anthropology open to change and healing. This framework prioritizes truth in charity, doctrinal fidelity, and human dignity without compromise.