A Muslim father tries to burn his daughters alive for becoming Christians
A father in Kibenge, Kasese District, Uganda, set his home on fire after his daughters converted to Christianity. The girls were sleeping when the house was set ablaze with petrol, but they managed to escape the flames. The incident occurred on September 6, 2026, and the girls survived with only personal belongings lost. The case highlights tensions between religious conversion and family reactions in Uganda.
about 22 hours ago
ZENIT reported that two sisters in Uganda survived an overnight house fire allegedly started by their father after they converted from Islam to Christianity. The fire destroyed their home and belongings, but the sisters escaped and said the incident strengthened their Christian faith. 1
Amina and Shamila were inside their home in Kibenge, in Uganda’s Kasese District, at around midnight on September 6, 2026, when the house caught fire. Their father, identified as Muhamud, allegedly poured petrol on the building and set it alight while they were sleeping. 1
According to the report, Muhamud had threatened to act under what he described as Islamic law after the sisters converted to Christianity on August 26. The sisters awoke to the smell of fuel and found flames surrounding the house. 1
The sisters escaped by removing bricks from a wall and creating an opening through which they could flee. Christian neighbors then rescued them and contacted local authorities. 1
The fire destroyed nearly all of their possessions, including mattresses, clothing, and other personal belongings. They survived without losing their lives, but their home was almost entirely destroyed. 1
Local Christian leaders condemned the arson and said it violated Ugandan law. They called for the father to be brought to justice. 1
A local chief, who was not named, praised God for protecting the sisters and commended nearby Christians for helping them. The chief also condemned what he described as murderous acts carried out under the guise of religious conflict. 1
Amina said the fire destroyed their shelter but did not destroy their faith or hope in Jesus Christ. She and Shamila reportedly said their faith had become stronger after surviving the attack. 1
Examine Catholic teachings on interfaith conversion and familial conflict
Catholic teaching holds together two principles: religious conversion must be free and conscientious, while family relationships should ordinarily be preserved through love, patience, and peace. Conflict may arise when loyalty to Christ appears to oppose family demands, but Christianity does not authorize coercion, hatred, or retaliation.
The Church recognizes a person’s civil right to adhere to, leave, or change a religion. It rejects pressure, threats, deception, and coercion in religious persuasion.
At the same time, Catholicism does not treat all religious claims as equally true. If someone becomes convinced of Catholic truth and freely seeks full communion with the Church, that decision should be respected as an act of conscience and potentially as a work of the Holy Spirit. Evangelization remains legitimate, but it must seek conviction through truth and charity rather than force.
This distinction is important: freedom of religion does not mean religious indifference, but it does mean that faith cannot authentically be imposed from outside. A coerced “conversion” is contrary to the nature of Christian faith.
Jesus warns that allegiance to him can provoke opposition even within a household: “a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.” The Church’s classical commentators interpret this not as a command to create family conflict, but as a realistic prediction that the Gospel can expose serious differences in belief and moral allegiance.
Thomas Aquinas explains that honoring parents remains obligatory unless obedience would draw a person away from the love of God. In that case, divine fidelity takes priority over family pressure. This is the principle behind the Christian teaching that the first commandment comes before every merely human loyalty.
Nevertheless, choosing faith does not normally require abandoning one’s relatives. Early Christian teaching emphasizes that believers should desire to remain close to family members, benefit them, teach them patiently, and pray for their conversion—even when relatives oppose or persecute them. Believers are also called to preserve peace among themselves and to be peacemakers.
Thus, the Church distinguishes between:
A convert should neither deny conscience to preserve domestic peace nor treat relatives with contempt. Catholic principles suggest several obligations:
Follow conscience responsibly. Conversion should arise from sincere conviction, not impulse or manipulation. The Church’s recognition of conscience presumes a search for truth, not simply personal preference.
Honor parents and family where possible. Family affection and respect remain genuine goods. They should not be discarded merely because religious disagreement exists.
Refuse participation in wrongdoing. If relatives demand apostasy, forbid essential Christian practice, or require conduct contrary to God’s commandments, obedience is not required. Aquinas states that one is not bound to obey authority that pulls one away from the love of God.
Witness without aggression. Christian mission relies on truth, charity, and the Holy Spirit, not intimidation or dishonest persuasion.
Forgive and pray. The early Christian witness treats prayer for persecuting relatives as part of following Christ, not as weakness or compromise.
Relatives may feel grief, fear, shame, or a sense of betrayal when someone changes religion. Those emotions can be understandable, but they do not justify threats, confinement, disinheritance, violence, or deprivation of civil rights. The Church specifically condemns religious coercion and notes that converts can face marginalization, loss of employment, imprisonment, and even death.
New converts—especially those experiencing social, economic, or physical insecurity—should receive practical and spiritual support from the Catholic community. They need formation in Christian faith, help in overcoming practices incompatible with the Gospel, and integration into the life of the Church.
The Church’s response to hostility should not be triumphalism. It should combine protection of the vulnerable with respect for the dignity of other family members. The goal is not to “win” a domestic battle, but to remain faithful while seeking reconciliation wherever possible.
Christ’s words about division should not be read as permission to despise nonbelievers or deliberately disrupt families. Chrysostom stresses that the conflict arises from opposing responses to the Gospel; it is not produced by Christian malice. The believer must therefore examine whether conflict results from fidelity to Christ or from unnecessary harshness, pride, provocation, or lack of charity.
The Catholic position can be summarized as follows:
The available materials establish these theological and pastoral principles, but they do not provide detailed guidance for every practical situation, such as custody disputes, forced marriage, or immediate threats of violence. In such cases, the person’s safety and lawful protection require direct assistance from trusted clergy, competent civil authorities, and appropriate safeguarding services.