Religious Liberty Commission examines grooming requirements, availability of chaplains in military
The Department of Justice’s Religious Liberty Commission held a meeting in Dallas to discuss religious liberty challenges for Americans in the armed forces. Key issues examined by witnesses included ensuring the availability of chaplains and addressing certain military grooming requirements. The commission, established by President Trump via executive order in May, is tasked with making recommendations to the president next spring regarding religious freedom protection. Bishop Robert E. Barron attended the hearing, which was the commission's fourth and first held outside the nation's capital. Concerns were raised regarding religious support contracts for Army chapels, noting the difficulty for priests to fulfill operational duties.
4 days ago
The U.S. Department of Justice's Religious Liberty Commission, established by President Donald Trump in May 2025, held its fourth hearing on December 10, 2025, in Dallas, Texas, focusing on religious freedom challenges in the military.1 2 3
Commission members, including Bishop Robert E. Barron and Rev. Franklin Graham, heard testimony from military veterans, chaplains, and experts highlighting issues like chaplain availability, grooming standards, and vaccine mandates.1 2 3
The hearing aims to inform a spring 2026 report with recommendations to protect religious liberty for service members of all faiths.1 2
Witnesses emphasized the historical and ongoing role of chaplains in supporting service members' spiritual needs, dating back to George Washington's 1775 request for religious leaders.2 3
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Doug Carver described how chaplains' primary duties as religious leaders have been diminished, with roles shifting to "spiritual readiness coaches" and morale officers since the 1970s.2 3
Msgr. Anthony Frontiero of the Archdiocese for the Military Services raised concerns about canceled Army chapel support contracts, stressing that Catholic sacraments are doctrinal obligations, not preferences, essential for service members' dignity and resilience.1
New Department of Defense guidelines under Secretary Pete Hegseth, reverting to pre-2010 standards, restrict religious accommodations for facial hair and turbans, affecting Sikhs and others.1
Retired Marine Capt. Sukhbir Singh Toor testified that these policies force religious minorities to violate their faith before seeking waivers, conflicting with constitutional equal opportunity.1
Hegseth's September 2025 speech targeting "beardos" and eliminating waivers has drawn criticism for undermining service by faith-adherent recruits.1
Historian David Barton traced military religious freedom to the nation's founding, arguing widespread hostility began in 2009 under the Obama administration and persisted under Biden.2 3
Examples include 2010 orders to remove Bible verses from weapon scopes, 2011 halt to just war theory training based on St. Augustine, and 2012 removal of "God" from an Air Force patch.2 3
Barton noted efforts to outsource chaplains and secularize education, fostering "fear and timidity" among religious leaders in the military.2 3
Testimony highlighted how mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations in 2020-2021 led to over 19,000 troops resigning or being discharged on religious grounds, including Marine veteran Mike Berry.2 3
Berry described being placed on inactive status without notice, affecting his family's Tricare benefits, and argued that such policies erode national security by deterring religious youth from enlisting.2 3
While the Vatican deemed vaccines morally permissible but voluntary for Catholics, witnesses viewed mandates as infringing on conscience.1 2 3
Witnesses urged improved religious liberty training, elimination of anti-religious educational materials portraying America negatively, and embedding religious freedom in national security strategy.2 3
Frontiero recommended educating commanders on Catholic sacramental needs and ensuring chaplain access for remote assignments.1
Toor called for preserving fair accommodation processes, while critics like Americans United for Separation of Church and State labeled the commission a tool for Christian nationalism.1
Commissioners, including Kelly Shackelford, affirmed that upholding service members' freedoms is essential for those risking their lives.2 3
Investigate the Catholic Church’s doctrinal stance on military chaplaincy
The Catholic Church has long affirmed the vital role of military chaplaincy as an essential expression of its pastoral mission, rooted in the dual commitment to spiritual care and the promotion of peace amid the realities of armed conflict. Drawing from papal teachings and conciliar documents, the Church views military chaplains not merely as providers of religious services but as witnesses to Christ's love, educators in human dignity, and agents of reconciliation in environments marked by violence. This stance emphasizes that while war dehumanizes, chaplains are called to humanize it through faith, ethics, and the sacraments, ultimately orienting service toward the abolition of war itself. The doctrinal foundation is built on the recognition of soldiers as "ministers of security and freedom" who contribute to peace when acting justly, with chaplains ensuring their actions align with Gospel values.
The Church's engagement with military chaplaincy traces back to its self-understanding as a spiritual army combating evil, as articulated by Pope Leo XIII, who likened the Church to a disciplined force where obedience and virtue are paramount. This metaphorical framework underscores the need for pastoral guidance in military contexts, extending to the specific institution of military ordinariates formalized in the 1983 apostolic constitution Spirituali Militum Curae. Pope Benedict XVI highlighted this document as outlining the ecclesial mission of these ordinariates, which exist to provide comprehensive spiritual assistance to armed forces personnel and their families, ensuring access to the means of salvation and fostering a Christian synthesis of military duty and love of God and neighbor.
The Second Vatican Council's Gaudium et Spes (no. 79) provides a cornerstone doctrine, stating that those in military service should see themselves as guardians of their people's security and freedom, contributing to peace when fulfilling their duties rightly. This vision integrates military life into the Church's broader social teaching, rejecting any glorification of war while affirming legitimate defense. Popes have consistently built on this, with John Paul II noting a "notable tradition of pastoral care to military personnel" that respects their service without compromising Christian ethics. Similarly, Benedict XVI encouraged military ordinaries and chaplains to be "faithful heralds of the truth of peace" in all contexts. These teachings affirm chaplaincy as an integral part of the Church's presence in society, adapting to modern challenges like non-international conflicts and peacekeeping missions.
Doctrinally, military chaplains are ordained ministers tasked with evangelization, sacramental life, and moral formation within armed forces, embodying the Church's solicitude for those in service. Pope John Paul II described their vocation as witnessing Christ's love even in "the harshest combats," respecting the dignity of adversaries, civilians, and all involved in conflict. This includes promoting inter arma caritas—charity under arms—a principle rooted in Christian inspiration for humanitarian efforts, as exemplified by the Red Cross's founding. Chaplains must educate military personnel on the ethical dimensions of international humanitarian law, transforming it from a legal code into a lived ethic of human dignity.
Pope Francis elaborated on this role in addressing military chaplains' formation, emphasizing their duty to foster spiritual and ethical dimensions that help soldiers navigate the "excruciating difficulties" of service. In a world experiencing a "piecemeal third world war," chaplains are to build bridges of mediation and reconciliation, never viewing others as mere enemies but as persons created in God's image, each "immensely holy." Their pastoral work extends to families, offering the "balm of the Word of God," Eucharist, and Reconciliation to heal spiritual wounds from witnessing atrocities. John Paul II further stressed the chaplain's unique position in the "new evangelization" of the military world, guiding laity in armed forces to live as witnesses to Christ while contributing to peace stability.
The Church insists on chaplains' independence from military command structures to preserve their prophetic voice, as seen in calls for them to avoid entanglement in worldly affairs, echoing St. Paul's advice to Timothy. Prayer is non-negotiable; Francis urged chaplains to dedicate significant daily time to it, as without prayer, fulfilling humanity's and God's demands in war zones is impossible. Collectively, these doctrines position chaplains as enablers of a "ministerium pacis inter arma"—service of peace amid arms—integrating faith into military life without compromise.
Central to the Church's stance is the tension between just defense and the Gospel's call to peace, with chaplaincy serving as a bridge. While acknowledging war's dehumanizing nature, popes emphasize humanitarian law's role in safeguarding civilians, the wounded, prisoners, and the environment, banning superfluous suffering and indiscriminate weapons. Francis called for its dissemination among all forces, including non-state actors, and further development to address modern arsenals. This aligns with John Paul II's insistence that chaplains contribute to reconciliation post-conflict, fostering peace through dignity-respecting actions.
The doctrine unequivocally prioritizes peace: Christians remain "deeply convinced that the ultimate aim... is the abolition of war." Benedict XVI echoed this in thanking chaplains for resolving conflicts and restoring peace conditions, reminding them of their contribution to global security. Earlier, Pius XI noted how priests in wartime brought religious consolations, countering prejudices and highlighting self-sacrifice, drawing good from evil through God's wisdom. Yet, chaplains must caution against over-involvement in politics, maintaining focus on spiritual guidance. In controversies over war's morality, the Church's stance is nuanced: legitimate service is affirmed, but only when aligned with charity and justice, with chaplains as moral compasses. No sources suggest endorsement of aggressive war; instead, they uniformly promote peace-building.
Military chaplaincy faces doctrinal challenges like spiritual wounds from atrocities, family disruptions, and the risk of moral compromise in conflict. Francis addressed returning soldiers' "indelible marks," urging special pastoral attention to make them feel the Church's "motherly closeness." Chaplains are to accompany them as "comforting and brotherly" presences, regenerating souls through sacraments. John Paul II and Benedict XVI reinforced this by calling for deep faith formation, enabling personnel to live as "authentic witnesses to Christ" in their sphere.
In interdenominational contexts, the Church supports collaborative efforts, as seen in addresses to international conferences, promoting shared ethical education. Where sources touch on historical interruptions—like World War I's impact on missions—they highlight compensations through priests' wartime ministry, reaffirming chaplaincy's enduring value. Overall, the doctrine calls for renewed apostolic zeal, ensuring chaplains and laity in forces are "ministers of security and freedom" oriented toward peace.
In conclusion, the Catholic Church's doctrinal stance on military chaplaincy is one of affirmative pastoral commitment, grounded in Gaudium et Spes and papal exhortations, viewing chaplains as vital for evangelizing armed forces, upholding human dignity, and advancing peace. This role demands prayerful fidelity, ethical formation, and reconciliation efforts, always with the horizon of war's abolition. By integrating these teachings, the Church offers a hopeful witness that even in conflict, charity and truth can prevail.