Scotland: Bishops concerned at calls to decriminalise abortion
Scotland’s bishops expressed deep concern over calls to decriminalise abortion and remove existing legal safeguards. They warned that the proposals could permit abortion up to birth for any reason, including sex selection. The bishops said human dignity begins at conception and called for society to protect both mother and child, especially when vulnerable. They rejected describing abortion as an ordinary or safe healthcare procedure, while acknowledging the difficult circumstances some women face during pregnancy.
1 day ago
Scotland’s bishops have urged the Scottish Government and members of the Scottish Parliament to reject renewed calls to decriminalise abortion, arguing that removing existing safeguards could allow abortion up to birth for any reason. They called instead for expanded support for pregnant women and families.
Bishop John Keenan, president of the Bishops’ Conference of Scotland’s Marriage, Family and Life Commission, issued the statement on behalf of the conference. The bishops said they were concerned that the proposals would remove legal protections for unborn children and permit sex-selective abortion.
The conference said human dignity begins at conception and continues until natural death, and that a just society should protect both mother and child, particularly when either is vulnerable. It rejected the Scottish Greens’ reported position that abortion should be treated like any other healthcare procedure, describing abortion as the deliberate ending of an unborn human life.
While acknowledging that pregnancy can involve difficult and distressing circumstances, the bishops called for practical support, compassionate care and alternatives to abortion. They urged greater investment in maternity services, perinatal mental-health support, family-assistance programmes, pregnancy counselling and other help for women facing challenging pregnancies.
The statement also argued that public discussion should consider responsibilities and the rights of others, not only personal autonomy and choice. It called on the government and MSPs to weigh the proposals’ ethical, medical and social implications.
Human dignity and legal protection of unborn life
In Catholic teaching, the dignity of unborn human life does not depend on age, ability, health, wantedness, or legal recognition. Because that dignity belongs to the human being from the beginning of life, the law should recognize and protect unborn children’s right to life. This is a moral principle, not a claim about what the current law is in any particular country.
The Church teaches that human life is to be respected and treated as personal life from conception. The embryo’s development is continuous; the Church therefore rejects assigning different degrees of human worth at different developmental stages. It holds that the embryo has the dignity proper to a person from the beginning, even though philosophical or scientific investigation cannot experimentally observe the spiritual soul.
This dignity is intrinsic: it belongs to the human being and is not earned through developed abilities or conferred by other people. John Paul II describes it as equal and undiminished at every stage of life, while Pope Benedict XVI insists that human dignity cannot be made conditional on a gradual account of development.
The underlying reasoning is both philosophical and theological. The Church appeals to reason and the natural moral law—the moral order that human reason can recognize—as well as to the belief that each human life is created and loved by God. It therefore regards the right to life as belonging to the unborn child, not as a benefit granted at another person’s discretion.
If unborn children possess the same basic human dignity as other human beings, the law should not treat them as outside the protection owed to human life. John Paul II states that rights should be recognized from conception, especially the inviolable right of every innocent human being to life.
Pope Francis connects the defense of unborn life with the defense of human rights generally: if protection depends on a person’s stage of development or usefulness, the foundations of equal human rights become vulnerable to changing political judgments. The Church’s argument is thus broader than a particular political policy: legal systems should protect human beings because of who they are, rather than make protection depend on capacities or social acceptance.
That principle does not by itself specify the precise wording of a constitution or statute, the appropriate penalties, or how every difficult legal conflict should be resolved. The supplied Catholic texts establish the moral claim for legal recognition and protection, but do not provide a jurisdiction-specific legal analysis or a complete legislative program.
Catholic teaching presents protection of unborn life as a matter of justice toward the most vulnerable, not merely as a religious preference. It argues that law should recognize a dignity it does not create, and that equal human worth must not be restricted to those able to speak, reason, or defend themselves.
Accordingly, the Catholic position is that unborn life deserves legal protection from its beginning. How a particular legal system should implement that protection—and how it should address specific cases—requires careful legal and moral analysis beyond the general principles established here.