Seton Hall president ‘not implicated’ in internal sex allegation report, Newark Archdiocese says
Archdiocese of Newark released a report concluding that Seton Hall president Monsignor Joseph Reilly was not implicated in the internal Latham report regarding sex abuse allegations. The report, conducted by Ropes & Gray LLP, found that Reilly responded promptly to a 2012 sexual harassment allegation involving a seminarian but did not follow Title IX procedures due to lack of training. No evidence was found that Reilly had knowledge of or failed to report sexual misconduct by former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick during his tenure at Seton Hall or as McCarrick’s secretary in the 1990s. Archbishop Joseph Tobin affirmed Reilly’s good standing and expressed confidence in his leadership, while a New Jersey appeals court ruled that Seton Hall need not fully disclose the Latham report in ongoing clergy abuse lawsuits.
3 months ago
Seton Hall University President Monsignor Joseph Reilly was cleared of wrongdoing in a new investigation by the Archdiocese of Newark, which concluded that he did not conceal or fail to report sexual‑abuse allegations tied to former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. The archdiocesan review, conducted by law firm Ropes & Gray, found no evidence that Reilly witnessed or received any reports of misconduct by McCarrick or others, and affirmed his prompt response to a 2012 sexual‑harassment case involving seminarians, though noting he lacked Title IX training. 1
The “Latham report,” commissioned by Seton Hall in 2019 after McCarrick‑related scandals, examined whether Reilly, then rector of Immaculate Conception Seminary, knew of abuse allegations and failed to act. The report has never been released publicly. 2
Reilly’s prompt handling of the 2012 harassment case was noted, but the archdiocese said he did not follow Seton Hall’s Title IX reporting procedures because he had not been trained on them. 1
A New Jersey appeals court ruled in June that Seton Hall is not required to disclose the full Latham report in ongoing clergy‑abuse lawsuits, though a portion concerning the university’s sexual‑harassment policies may be entered into evidence with possible redactions. 2
Cardinal Joseph Tobin reiterated his confidence in Reilly, describing him as a “good priest with formidable experience” and stating the new findings do not alter his favorable view of the president. 1
Overall, the Archdiocese of Newark’s independent review exonerates Monsignor Reilly from allegations of covering up abuse, while highlighting a training gap in Title IX compliance and confirming the university’s limited legal obligation to release the full investigative report.*
Investigate Catholic protocols for reporting sexual abuse allegations
Catholic law treats sexual abuse of minors as both a civil crime (handled by the State with its criminal process) and an ecclesial canonical delict (handled by Church authorities through canonical procedures). The Church’s reporting protocols therefore aim at prompt notification, respect for victims, privacy and good reputation, and full cooperation with civil authorities, following the civil-law requirements for reporting.
For universal canonical purposes, the relevant category is the “delict against the sixth commandment… committed by a cleric with a minor below the age of eighteen years,” with further clarification that a person who habitually lacks use of reason is treated as equivalent to a minor in this context.
The Church also expects episcopal conferences and diocesan structures to translate universal norms into practical local guidelines for bishops and major superiors when they receive allegations.
Under Vos estis lux mundi (Pope Francis), when a cleric learns information or has well-founded motives to believe certain abuse-related acts have occurred, the cleric is obliged to report promptly to the local Ordinary (where the events are said to have occurred) or to another Ordinary listed in the law—except when the information is learned “during the exercise of ministry in the internal forum.”
The same law states that any person, particularly lay faithful exercising Church offices or ministries, may submit a report using the listed methods or other appropriate means.
The Vos estis lux mundi framework centers on reporting to the local Ordinary where the events occurred (or another Ordinary among those designated).
The report “can always be sent” to the competent dicastery, and the dicastery will then inform the pontifical representative if that channel is chosen.
A report must include “as many particulars as possible,” including:
Separately, the Church’s protection guidelines also envision receiving reports first through designated Church personnel (e.g., a “Contact Person for the protection of minors”) and then formalizing them in writing for transmission into the canonical process.
Catholic protocol stresses that:
The bishop (or major superior) retains the ability to limit the accused cleric’s ministry while accusations are clarified.
Where sexual abuse is connected to an additional delict against the dignity of the sacrament of Penance, the person reporting has the right to request that the reporter’s name not be made known to the priest denounced (as referenced in the CDF guidance).
The Church’s protection procedures state that alleged victims and their families have the right to be:
They should also receive spiritual and psychological assistance, and (as described in the guidelines) medical and social assistance, including emergency psychological help.
In one set of institutional norms, the Vicar General (or designated Contact Person) is directed to:
Catholic norms explicitly state that civil reporting duties must be followed.
“Civil law concerning reporting of crimes to the appropriate authorities should always be followed.”
The CDF guidance reiterates that cooperation with civil authority is important because sexual abuse of minors is not only a canonical delict but also a crime prosecuted by civil law, and civil-law reporting requirements should always be followed (while respecting that the sacramental internal forum has its own protections).
The Church also articulates the underlying rationale: the State investigates and punishes according to its jurisdiction and due process, while the Church applies its own canonical system—and Church authorities are to cooperate and not impede the legitimate path of civil justice.
Based on the cited norms, the core reporting protocol is:
Catholic protocols for reporting sexual abuse allegations require prompt reporting, detailed factual statements, and an ecclesial submission to the local Ordinary (or the designated higher Church authority), while simultaneously insisting that civil-law reporting to civil authorities must be followed and that the Church must cooperate with civil justice rather than impede it.