Supreme Court will hear from religious preschools challenging exclusion from taxpayer-funded program
Supreme Court agreed to hear case from Catholic preschools claiming exclusion from state‑funded preschool program violates religious rights. The case involves Colorado's St. Mary Catholic Parish and Archdiocese of Denver, backed by the Trump administration. Schools argue they cannot admit children from LGBTQ+ families, leading to exclusion from taxpayer‑funded program. The decision reflects ongoing religious rights litigation before the conservative‑majority court.
1 day ago
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge by Catholic preschools in Colorado that they were barred from the state’s universal, taxpayer‑funded preschool tuition program because of their religious admission policies. The case raises questions about the balance between nondiscrimination requirements and religious liberty protections under the Constitution. 1 2 3
The Colorado “universal” preschool program, created by a 2020 ballot measure, provides families with up to $6,000 in tuition assistance to enroll children in any participating preschool, public or private. 2
Two Catholic preschools – St. Mary Catholic Parish and another school in the Archdiocese of Denver – were excluded after the state said their faith‑based admission rules, which require families to support Catholic teachings on gender and sexuality, violated the program’s nondiscrimination clause covering sexual orientation and gender identity. 1 3
The preschools, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, argue that Colorado is unlawfully denying them access to a public benefit because of their religious beliefs. 1 3
Plaintiffs’ position: The schools contend that the state’s exclusion violates the Free Exercise Clause, asserting that “states cannot exclude families from government benefits because of their faith.” 1 3 They point to prior Supreme Court rulings that have protected religious schools’ participation in public‑funded programs. 1
State’s position: Colorado maintains that participation requires compliance with the program’s nondiscrimination rule, which it applies uniformly to all providers, including those that prioritize children with disabilities or low‑income families. 1 2
Broader jurisprudence: The case will be considered alongside earlier decisions, such as the Court’s 2022 ruling protecting a high‑school football coach’s on‑field prayer and the 2021 decision favoring a Catholic foster‑care agency, as well as recent rulings limiting LGBTQ‑related protections. 1
Catholic families: Parents like Dan and Lisa Sheley, who have seven children, say they simply want the “freedom to choose the best preschool” without being penalized for their faith. 2 3
State officials: Colorado Governor Jared Polis praised the earlier appellate ruling that upheld the exclusion, describing the program as “free from discrimination” and emphasizing its success in expanding preschool enrollment. 3
Legal advocates: Becket senior counsel Nicholas Reaves expressed confidence that the Court will “put a stop to Colorado’s no‑Catholics‑need‑apply rules” and reaffirm religious‑freedom precedent. 1 2
If the Court rules for the preschools, Colorado may have to allow religious schools that impose faith‑based admission criteria to receive public tuition aid, potentially reshaping how nondiscrimination rules apply to publicly funded education programs nationwide. 1 3
Conversely, a decision upholding the state’s stance could reinforce the authority of nondiscrimination provisions in school‑choice initiatives and limit the scope of religious‑exemption claims in future cases. 2
Investigate Catholic schools’ right to participate in public preschool programs
Catholic teaching supports the idea that Catholic schools (including those serving preschool ages) may participate in publicly funded early-childhood programs insofar as doing so respects two things: (1) the freedom and rights of parents to choose an education aligned with their conscience, and (2) the Church’s and family’s inherent rights so that public authorities do not force religious communities to act against their convictions.
Catholic sources consistently place parents at the center of education. Parents are described as having fundamental rights to select the educational environment that corresponds to their convictions, and public authority must guarantee the concrete conditions for that exercise.
This principle matters for preschool participation because, in practice, public preschool programs typically function as a gateway to public funding, services, and regulated enrollment. Catholic schools’ claim to participate is therefore not merely administrative—it is rooted in the moral right of parents to choose.
Pius XI teaches that the state must respect the inherent rights of the Church and the family in Christian education, and that it is unjust and unlawful for any monopoly to force families to use government schools against their Christian conscience (or even against their legitimate preferences).
In other words: if a public preschool system is structured so that religious schools cannot participate (or can participate only by surrendering religious identity), it risks functioning like a “monopoly” that pressures families away from lawful alternatives.
Catholic social doctrine (as echoed in these sources) does not treat public money as automatically “for government schools only.” Rather, Pius XI argues that where religious education is not aided from public funds as distributive justice requires, it should not be opposed by civil authority ready to recognize family rights and legitimate liberty.
A closely connected idea appears in the Catholic education document on the Catholic school’s public role: the public authority, under distributive justice, must allocate public subsidies so that parents are “truly free” to select schools in accordance with conscience.
Practical implication for preschool: a public preschool program that provides benefits only to children in government-run settings—without offering a lawful pathway for Catholic preschools to receive comparable recognition and funding—would likely be difficult to reconcile with a distributive-justice model as described here.
A 1977 Catholic education source notes that in countries where governments recognized the advantages and necessity of educational plurality, Catholic schools moved from merely receiving grants to entering into agreements, conventions, and contracts that preserve the Catholic school’s special status while securing an economic and juridical position comparable to state schools.
Another Church document emphasizes constructive dialogue with civil authorities and that the Catholic school can “willingly occupy its place” within the school system and in state legislation—when the state respects fundamental human rights (including religious freedom).
Practical implication: Catholic preschool programs can reasonably seek a structure where they are regulated and recognized as part of the wider public early-childhood system—without being compelled to abandon their educational and religious project.
The USCCB’s policy letter makes a point particularly relevant to preschool program design: it supports federal educational choice while stating that government is not allowed to intrude into the religious identity or mission of a private school, and that protections ensure private and religious institutions can participate.
Although that text focuses on U.S. legislation and scholarships rather than preschool specifically, the underlying moral logic applies: government recognition should not require religious institutions to redefine themselves in contradiction to conscience.
Pius XI’s teaching against educational monopolies is direct: public authorities may not force families to make use of government schools contrary to conscience.
In the preschool context, this boundary typically translates into conditions such as:
Your question is “right to participate,” and Catholic teaching supports participation that is compatible with the school’s mission and parents’ conscience—rather than participation as a forced compromise of religious identity.
A document from the Congregation for Catholic Education describes Catholic schools as having a “public role” and being open to all who appreciate and share the qualified educational project, while remaining configured “in the perspective of the Catholic faith.”
So Catholic preschool participation does not mean Catholic schools become indistinguishable from state providers. Rather, they can be publicly useful and welcoming while remaining faithful to their educational and religious character.
When assessing a specific preschool program or policy proposal, Catholic principles in these sources suggest checking at least four criteria:
Does it preserve parental choice in practice?
The Church supports parental freedom to choose educational settings aligned with conscience, and public authority must ensure concrete conditions for that choice.
Is the program structured in a way that avoids a practical “monopoly”?
Catholic teaching condemns educational monopolies that force families into government schools contrary to conscience or legitimate preference.
Does distributive justice require subsidy access for alternatives?
Where public funds are involved, the Church teaches subsidies must be allocated so parents are truly free to select schools according to conscience.
Does participation come with intrusion into religious identity or mission?
A key safeguard is that government must not intrude into religious identity/mission in a way that would negate the school’s nature.
If a program fails these criteria—e.g., it bars Catholic preschools outright without adequate justification, or makes eligibility contingent on stripping away religious mission—Catholic teaching provides grounds for concern, even if the policy is framed as “neutral.”
Catholic teaching supports a strong right in principle for Catholic schools—up to and including preschool—to participate in public early-childhood programs when such participation protects parental educational choice, avoids forcing families into government schooling contrary to conscience, applies distributive justice to public subsidies, and prevents state intrusion into the school’s religious mission.
If you share the country and the specific preschool policy design you have in mind (e.g., whether it is a voucher, block grant to providers, licensing-based reimbursement, or a required curriculum model), I can apply these Catholic principles more precisely to that exact structure.