Tennessee bishops call for end to death penalty; Trump approves military firing squad execution
Tennessee’s Catholic bishops urged the state to replace the death penalty with life imprisonment without parole, saying it can protect society and preserve the possibility of repentance. The bishops’ statement followed a botched execution of Christa Pike, who remained in critical condition; Tennessee’s governor halted executions for the rest of 2026. The bishops cited Catholic teaching that capital punishment is inadmissible because every person retains human dignity and should not be deprived of the possibility of redemption. Separately, President Donald Trump approved an execution by military firing squad, according to a Pentagon spokesperson.
about 2 hours ago
Tennessee’s Catholic bishops are urging the state to replace executions with life imprisonment without parole, following a failed attempt to execute Christa Pike. Separately, President Donald Trump approved a military firing-squad execution for former Army major Nidal Malik Hasan, according to the articles. 1 2
In an Oct. 2 statement, the Tennessee Catholic Conference said life without parole can protect the public and impose lasting punishment while respecting the dignity of every person. The bishops argued that executions cannot restore victims’ lives and that the uncertainty and suffering surrounding them can intensify anguish for victims’ families, prisoners’ families, and execution staff. 1 2
Their appeal followed Tennessee’s Sept. 30 attempt to execute Pike, 50, which was halted after two doses of pentobarbital failed to kill her. She remained on a ventilator in critical condition; the articles report that the episode was the state’s second botched execution of the year, prompted the resignation of Department of Correction Commissioner Frank Strada, and was followed by Gov. Bill Lee’s moratorium on executions through the end of 2026. 1 2
Pike was sentenced to death for the 1995 murder of Colleen Slemmer, whom Pike and her boyfriend tortured before killing. The articles also note that Pike later attempted to strangle another prisoner and tried to escape. 1 2
The bishops’ statement reflects the Catholic Church’s revised teaching: the 2018 revision of the Catechism of the Catholic Church says the death penalty is inadmissible, citing the continuing dignity of people convicted of serious crimes and the need to preserve the possibility of redemption. It also says modern detention systems can protect the public and calls on the Church to work toward abolition. 1 2
On Oct. 5, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell announced on X that Trump had approved a military firing-squad execution for Hasan. Hasan was sentenced to death by court-martial in 2013 for the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, in which 13 people were killed and 32 wounded; Parnell said the Army secretary would decide the execution’s date and location. 1 2
Human dignity, repentance, and the moral limits of punishment
The Catholic case against the death penalty is not that grave crimes deserve no punishment, or that victims’ suffering should be minimized. It is that punishment must serve justice and protect society without treating an offender as if his or her human dignity had been erased. That principle gives particular weight to the Tennessee bishops’ call to replace execution with life imprisonment without parole: if society can be protected by non-lethal means, the possibility of repentance should not be permanently closed.
Catholic teaching recognizes the dignity of both victims and offenders. A person who commits a terrible crime remains a human being whose life is a gift from God; dignity is not a reward for good conduct that can be forfeited by wrongdoing. This does not excuse the crime or remove the offender’s responsibility. Rather, it means the state must punish in a way that respects the humanity of everyone involved.
Punishment can itself acknowledge that humanity: holding someone accountable takes seriously that the person acted freely and is responsible for the harm done. But accountability is not the same as vengeance. Christian punishment should redress wrongdoing, protect the public, and leave room for the offender to change.
Repentance does not undo a crime, restore what victims have lost, or require society to release someone who remains dangerous. But it matters because a person’s moral future is not wholly determined by the worst act he or she has committed. The possibility of conversion and reform is one reason the Church regards non-lethal punishment as preferable when it can adequately protect the public. Execution definitively removes that possibility; secure imprisonment can protect society while leaving the offender time to repent and, where possible, make amends.
The Ukrainian Catholic Catechism expresses this purpose by saying punishment should not be society’s revenge, but should help create the conditions for conversion, reconciliation with God, and eventual return to society. That does not mean every offender will repent or be fit to re-enter society. It means punishment should not foreclose those possibilities unnecessarily.
Catholic teaching recognizes the state’s duty to defend people and maintain public order. But punishment must be proportionate, and the state should use means that respect human dignity when those means are sufficient. John Paul II taught that execution could be considered only in cases of absolute necessity to defend society, while observing that such cases had become very rare, if not practically nonexistent. The Compendium likewise says that where non-lethal means can effectively prevent further harm, they are more consistent with human dignity and preserve the possibility of reform.
This is why the bishops’ appeal is not simply leniency toward criminals. It is a judgment about what justice requires when secure, non-lethal punishment can protect the public. Pope Francis connects opposition to the death penalty with recognition that even the worst criminal retains an inalienable dignity.
The supplied material does not give the full details of the Tennessee bishops’ statement or the circumstances of the proposed execution, so those particulars cannot be assessed here. But the moral principle is clear: punishment must take crime seriously, protect the innocent, and uphold victims’ dignity—without denying that an offender remains a person capable of repentance.