“Todos, todos, todos!”
Vatican News released a 27‑minute documentary titled “Todos, todos, todos” marking the first anniversary of Pope Francis’s death. The film highlights key moments of his pontificate, emphasizing his focus on mercy, the poor, and dialogue. It uses archival footage and subtitles in Italian, Spanish, and English, and is available on Vatican News, Vatican Radio, and L’Osservatore Romano. The documentary frames the Pope’s legacy as a Church that “goes forth” and engages with the margins. The title reflects his famous phrase “todos, todos, todos” and underscores his commitment to inclusivity.
1 day ago
The Vatican released a 27‑minute documentary titled “Todos, todos, todos!” on the first anniversary of Pope Francis’s death, offering a concise visual tribute that highlights the Argentine pontiff’s pastoral vision, emphasis on mercy, and commitment to the peripheries of society.
The film assembles archival footage and images to portray Pope Francis’s “Church that goes forth,” stressing dialogue, presence amid historical wounds, and a concrete translation of the Gospel into everyday gestures. It frames his papacy as a “living memory” that continues to challenge the Church and the world today1.
The documentary is accessible on Vatican News platforms and includes subtitles in Italian, Spanish, and English, ensuring a broad international audience1.
Released exactly one year after Pope Francis’s death (21 April 2026), the film is part of a coordinated effort by Vatican News, Vatican Radio, and L’Osservatore Romano to commemorate his life and legacy. It coincides with a series of liturgical and diplomatic events scheduled for the same dates, such as the Regina Caeli prayer, Holy Rosary, and multiple ceremonies in Angola and Equatorial Guinea1.
"Assess Pope Francis’s legacy of mercy and inclusivity in Church history."
Pope Francis’s legacy of mercy and inclusivity can be assessed as a distinctive “style” of Church life: he presents mercy not as an optional sentiment but as the foundation of the Church’s pastoral action, and he treats inclusion not as mere political correctness but as a pastoral conversion—expressed in concrete welcoming gestures toward people who are weary, excluded, fragile, disabled, sinful, migrants, and otherwise “on the margins.”
Francis repeatedly frames mercy as the core principle by which the Church’s credibility is judged. In the Bull of Indiction for the Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy, he states: “Mercy is the very foundation of the Church’s life. All of her pastoral activity should be caught up in the tenderness she makes present to believers; nothing in her preaching and in her witness to the world can be lacking in mercy.”
This matters historically because it shifts the Church’s self-understanding from mercy as a “theme” to mercy as an organizing criterion for evangelization and governance. Francis even diagnoses a cultural and ecclesial temptation: the “temptation… to focus exclusively on justice” can cause mercy to be forgotten, while the wider culture can treat mercy as if it has “dropped out of use.”
He also insists that mercy is dynamic—something the Church does. He describes mercy as “a journey that goes from the heart to the hands,” where forgiveness received from Christ becomes works of mercy for others. This “heart-to-hands” structure is important: it links interior conversion (forgiven and renewed) to outward works (not excluding, not turning away).
In the Chrism Mass context of Holy Thursday, Francis portrays mercy as “in motion,” seeking progress even in the “wasteland where indifference and violence have predominated.” He connects this to the Good Samaritan pattern: mercy gathers in “small gestures,” grows through acts of love, and aims at encounter rather than distance.
Finally, in the Jubilee retreat for priests, he ties mercy to pastoral effectiveness and institutional renewal: “unless our structures are vibrant and aimed at making us more open to God’s mercy and more merciful to others, they can turn into something… counterproductive.” In historical terms, Francis’s legacy is not simply rhetorical; he presses for conversion of pastoral structures so mercy remains operational, not symbolic.
A distinctive feature of Francis’s legacy is his insistence that mercy has an inclusively structured logic. In a Jubilee audience on “Mercy and inclusion,” he argues that the Gospel reveals “a great work of inclusion, which fully respects the freedom of every person… and calls everyone to form a family of brothers and sisters… and to be part of the Church.”
He makes a striking Christological claim about exclusion: Christ’s “arms outstretched on the cross show that no one is excluded from his love and his mercy, not even the greatest sinner: no one! We are all included in his love and in his mercy.”
Inclusivity also appears as a practical pastoral method. Francis warns against the temptation to “label” others by social status, language, race, culture, or religion, saying there is “only a person to be loved as God loves them.” This is a direct critique of ecclesial habits that create categories of “insiders” and “outsiders” within the worshipping community.
In a major address to persons with disabilities, Francis connects inclusivity to both practical barriers and spiritual belonging. He calls for guaranteeing access to buildings and making languages accessible—overcoming “physical barriers and prejudices.” But he says “this is not enough”: communities must promote “a spirituality of communion, so that every person feels part of a body.”
He explicitly identifies the Church as a home: “The Church is the home of everyone… without exclusion,” and warns against going “along the road of exclusion.” Most tellingly, he rejects inclusivity as a slogan: “There is no inclusion if… it remains a slogan, a formula to use in politically correct speeches… [and] if there is a lack of conversion.”
Historically, this is significant because it places inclusivity under the discipline of conversion. Inclusion is not merely an add-on to pastoral care; it is a demand that the Church undergo an interior and communal change.
In his homily for Holy Mass and canonization, Francis takes inclusivity into an explicitly moral and social key. He says he is “troubled” when communities “divide the world into the good and the bad, saints and sinners,” because that can produce a sense of superiority and lead to excluding those “God wants to embrace.”
He then applies this directly to emigrants: “The exclusion of emigrants is scandalous… [and] criminal,” describing the Mediterranean as “the largest cemetery in the world.” He links exclusion to sending people away to camps “where they are exploited and sold like slaves.”
This is a high-stakes element of his legacy: inclusivity is not only about internal Church attitudes but about public moral responsibility—doors, borders, and real human suffering.
Francis’s legacy also embeds inclusivity within a broader ecclesiology of mission and synodality. In the same homily (Holy Mass and canonization), he treats “walking together” as “synodal” vocation: the Church should be “truly open and inclusive of all,” welcoming people with “concrete gestures.”
This is aligned with his recurring “universal invitation” language. In the Address for World Mission Day 2024, he emphasizes mission’s recipients as “everyone,” describing this as “the heart of mission: that ‘all’, excluding no one.” The Gospel remains a call to encounter, recognition of brotherhood in diversity, and participation in a “delicious banquet.”
In historical context, this is not a new Christian idea, but Francis gives it a distinct pastoral emphasis: the Church’s mission is measured by how it draws all (without exclusion) into Christ’s salvific offer.
Scholarly commentary on Francis’s theology highlights that his approach involves “ecclesial conversion,” meaning the Church must renew itself toward its calling, rather than falling into self-preservation. Even if commentary is secondary, it helps interpret Francis’s consistent insistence that mercy and mission require structural and pastoral reorientation.
Francis’s mercy-centered legacy also presents a theological continuity with the Catholic tradition. He explicitly cites the idea that it is “proper to God to exercise mercy” and that this manifests omnipotence rather than weakness (in the tradition associated with St. Thomas).
In his deeper theological framing, mercy reveals the Trinitarian mystery: he links God’s mercy to the Church’s life as a communion rooted in the Father’s mercy revealed in Jesus and given through the Spirit. In other words, mercy and inclusivity are not merely humanitarian virtues; for Francis, they are theological expressions of who God is and how the Church participates in God’s life.
This is also why Francis connects mercy to sacramental and pastoral service: mercy is what makes the entire life of God’s people a “sacrament,” and “Being merciful… [is] the way of life,” not only a path among others.
Any assessment of inclusivity must note that Francis himself guards against inclusion becoming superficial. He repeatedly insists inclusion requires conversion and truth, not merely a rhetorical tone.
For example, when he says “There is no inclusion” if it is a slogan or lacks conversion, he is essentially warning against an appearance without interior reform. Likewise, his irritation at divisions of “saints and sinners” shows that inclusivity must be rooted in humility rather than in cultural or moral categories that make some feel superior.
There are also deeper ecclesiological tensions around synodality, discernment, and doctrinal unity. In scholarly discussion of Francis’s synodality theology, one concern raised is the possible “abuses of synodality” regarding unity of dogma and consensus on contested matters. While that is not Francis’s direct teaching in the provided texts, it highlights an important dynamic for historical assessment: Francis’s inclusivity is inseparable from ecclesial discernment, and the Church must maintain doctrinal integrity while living mercy.
So the legacy is best described as mercy-in-communion: inclusion is demanded precisely because Christ’s love “embraces” and because the Church must become a credible sign of that embrace through conversion and concrete action—not because inclusion is treated as an ideologically defined category.
In Church history, Pope Francis’s legacy of mercy and inclusivity is likely to be remembered less for a single policy and more for a method: mercy as the Church’s foundation; inclusion as the pastoral consequence of Christ’s embrace; and both as demands for conversion in hearts, communities, and structures.
He leaves the Church with a clear yardstick: the Church’s credibility is seen in how she shows merciful and compassionate love and whether she welcomes “everyone” through concrete gestures that transform exclusion into belonging.