Graditelji Božjega mesta

Matthew Harvey Sanders, izvršni direktor podjetja Longbeard, je 11. februarja 2026 v Pastoralnem središču Janeza Pavla II. nagovoril osebje nadškofije Vancouver z govorom z naslovom »Graditelji Božjega mesta«.

Govor se sooča z »digitalnim Rubikonom«, pred katerim stoji Cerkev, ko prehaja iz informacijske dobe v dobo inteligence. Avtor trdi, da lahko Cerkev z uvedbo »suverene umetne inteligence« za obvladovanje upravnih opravil osvobodi svoje voditelje, da se bodo lahko osredotočili na »sadove« služenja.

Uvod: Korenine in oblak

Vaša milost, nadškof Smith, častiti očetje, posvečene žene in možje ter predano osebje te nadškofije:

Posebna čast je biti danes z vami.

Ko stojim tukaj v Vancouvru, se ne počutim, kot da sem na obisku, ampak kot da sem se vrnil domov.

Ta del sveta ima v mojem srcu zelo posebno mesto. Ko sem bil mlad, sem več let živel na otoku Salt Spring.

Svoja oblikovna leta sem preživel, ko sem hodil po tihih obronkih obale in z našega balkona opazoval, kako so veliki tovorni ladijski kolosi tiho drseli skozi kanal—velikani trgovine, ki so nas povezovali s širšim svetom.

Pravzaprav je moj oče pokopan čez vodo na otoku Salt Spring.

Biti spet tukaj me spominja na nekaj bistvenega. Spominja me, da smo bitja časa in prostora.

Nismo zgolj misli, ki lebdijo v etru; smo telesa, zasajena v zemljo. Pripadamo določeni zemlji, določeni zgodovini in določeni skupnosti. Opredeljujejo nas stvari, ki se jih lahko dotaknemo, stvari, ki jih lahko ljubimo, in kraji, kjer pokopavamo svoje mrtve.

Ko pa danes zrem v vas – v osebje in vodstvo te nadškofije – se zavedam, da smo se zbrali, da bi govorili o sili, ki nas vleče v povsem nasprotno smer.

Nismo tukaj, da bi govorili o zemlji; tukaj smo, da govorimo o »oblaku«.

Tukaj smo, da razpravljamo o tehnološkem premiku, ki nas ogroža, da nas bo od naših korenin odtrgal bolj agresivno kot katera koli kulturna sila, ki smo ji bili priča po industrijski revoluciji.

Danes stojimo na pragu »digitalnega Rubikona«.

Zadnjih trideset let smo bili zaposleni predvsem z dostopom. Cilj je bil demokratizirati podatke, položiti optična vlakna in postaviti svetovne informacije na doseg roke.

Naloga opravljena.

Toda dostop ni več ozko grlo; razumevanje je.

Prestopamo prag iz dobe informacij – ko so bili podatki surovina – v dobo inteligence, v kateri je ta surovina obdelana, premišljena in izpopolnjena, še preden sploh doseže naše oči.

Premikamo se iz sveta, v katerem računalniki zgolj pridobivajo informacije, v svet, v katerem računalniki ustvarjajo ideje, simulirajo logiko in delujejo kot agenti v našem vsakdanjem življenju.

Premikamo se od orodij, ki nam služijo, k sistemom, ki nas skušajo posnemati.

Vprašanje ni, ali bi se Cerkev morala podati v vode umetne inteligence. V njih že plavamo. Če se mlad človek v vaši klopi za moralno jasnost raje obrne na algoritem kot na človeški obraz, ker se mu zdi varnejši, je dobi obdobja razprave konec.

Poplavne vode ne prihajajo; že so tukaj.

Vprašanje je: ali nam bo ta nova tehnologija pomagala zasaditi globlje korenine ali pa jih bo izruvala?

Vem, da je vaša nadškofija za to krajevno Cerkev določila štiri jasne prednostne naloge: da bo vsaka nedelja zares pomembna, da se približamo Jezusu, da okrepimo zakone in družine ter da razvijamo župnijsko voditeljstvo.

Moj današnji cilj je, da vam pokažem, kako je lahko ta nova tehnologija – če je pravilno usmerjena in zasidrana v »resničnem« – vaš najmočnejši zaveznik pri doseganju teh štirih ciljev.

A hkrati želim biti z vami odkrit. Želim vam pokazati, kako ta tehnologija, če jo ignoriramo, postane sila razkroja. Grozi, da bo odplaknila prst človeške povezanosti in razgalila ter izsušila same 'korenine', za katere si tako obupano prizadevamo, da bi jih poglobili.

Tu smo, da razpravljamo o tem, kako ostati človek – in kako ostati katoličan – v svetu, ki postaja vse bolj umeten.

Prvi del: Anatomija novega stroja

Da bi razumeli poslanstvo, moramo najprej razkrivati skrivnosti stroja.

Obstaja globoko zakoreninjen nagon, morda najmočnejši prav pri najbolj pobožnih, da se odvrnejo od umetne inteligence, kot da bi šlo za tekmovalno zavest.

Vidimo naslove. Vidimo umetno inteligenco, ki piše poezijo, opravlja pravosodni izpit in ustvarja umetnost, ki zmaguje na tekmovanjih. Ob tem čutimo mešanico občudovanja in strahu.

To povzroča strah. In strah je zelo slab svetovalec.

Toda kot katoličani imamo posebno zaupanje. Smo dediči izročila, ki je vedno verjelo, da vsa resnica – naj jo najdemo v Svetem pismu ali v znanosti – pripada Bogu. Na novosti ne gledamo s trepetom, temveč z odgovornostjo. Naša naloga ni, da pred temi sistemi bežimo, ampak da jih usmerimo k dobremu.

Poglejmo torej pod pokrov. Kakšna je ta tehnologija, ki osvaja ves svet?

V bistvu smo prešli od »klepetalnih botov« k »razsodnikom«.

Dolga desetletja so bili računalniki le razkošni kalkulatorji. Bili so »deterministični«. Če si vtipkal »2+2«, je računalnik vedno, brez izjeme, izpisal »4«. Bil je tog. Bil je varen.

Toda v zadnjih nekaj letih, še posebej pa z izjemnim pospeškom v zadnjih dvanajstih mesecih, smo odprli novo mejo.

Prenehali smo programirati računalnike vrstico za vrstico in jih začeli »gojiti«. Zgradili smo »nevronske mreže« – programske strukture, zasnovane tako, da na grob, a učinkovit način posnemajo povezljivost človeških možganov.

Te mreže smo nahranili z množico podatkov, ki si jo je težko predstavljati. Dali smo jim celoten javni internet. Vsako knjigo, vsak članek, vsako nit na Redditu, vsako vrstico kode, vsako pesem, vsako laž in vsako resnico, ki je na voljo na spletu.

In stroj se je učil. Ni si zgolj zapomnil; učil se je vzorcev. Učil se je, kako deluje jezik. Učil se je zgradbe logike.

Toda do nedavnega so bili ti modeli tisto, kar psihologi imenujejo misleci »Sistem 1«.

"Sistem 1" je tvoj hiter, instinktiven del možganov. To je tisti del tebe, ki odgovori "4", ko nekdo reče "2+2." To je del, ki se odzove sam od sebe.

Ti zgodnji modeli umetne inteligence so bili takšni – izstrelili so prvo stvar, ki je bila videti kot odgovor. Bili so nagnjeni k halucinacijam. Bili so ustvarjalni, vendar niso bili previdni.

That has changed.

We have now entered the era of "Test-Time Scaling," or "System 2" reasoning.

Think of it like a grandmaster playing chess. If they play 'blitz' chess, making a move every second, even a grandmaster will make blunders. They rely on instinct. But if you give that same grandmaster an hour to stare at the board, to simulate ten moves ahead, to weigh the risks and the sacrifices, they become nearly unbeatable.

We have stopped playing blitz with AI; we have given it the clock.

The newest models—like OpenAI's GPT 5.3 or Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6—can "think." They can pause. They can generate thousands of internal possibilities, evaluate them against the laws of logic, discard the bad ones, and deliver the best one.

We are seeing adoption rates that dwarf even the biggest social media giants. It took TikTok—the most viral app of the last decade—nine months to reach 100 million users. It took ChatGPT just two months.

This is not a wave; it's a tsunami.

Why does this matter to a parish secretary in Surrey or a youth minister in Vancouver? Why does this matter to the Chancery staff?

It matters because the barrier to doing things is about to collapse.

It means that the "drudgery" of administrative work—the drafting of emails, the summarizing of meeting minutes, the translation of bulletins, the scheduling of volunteers—can be offloaded to a machine that costs pennies to run.

But it also means something more dangerous.

It means that the "Knowledge Economy" is about to be turned upside down. The "white-collar" work—the writing, the analyzing, the consulting—is exactly what these machines do best.

If we aren't careful, we face a "Crisis of Meaning." When a machine can write a homily (or at least a mediocre one), when it can counsel a grieving person (with simulated empathy), when it can teach a catechism class (without the witness of a lived faith)... what is left for us? If the machine can do the work of the mind, what is the role of the human spirit?

This is where the Archdiocese of Vancouver's Priorities become our roadmap.

Because the machine can do the task, but it cannot fulfill the mission.

It can generate text, but it cannot generate grace.

Let's look at your four priorities through this lens.

Part II: Make Every Sunday Matter

Your first priority is to Make Every Sunday Matter. You want to "Celebrate like we mean it" and "Welcome like we mean it."

We all know the reality of parish life. We know the "Sunday Scramble."

Think of the average pastor in this Archdiocese. He is a good man. He loves his people. But he is also a CEO, a janitor, a fundraiser, a counselor, and a theologian all wrapped in one. He is fighting a war on ten fronts.

He sits down on Saturday night to write his homily. He is exhausted. He has just come from a finance council meeting where they debated the cost of fixing the boiler. He has a funeral tomorrow. He has a wedding rehearsal.

So, he writes something quick. He pulls a few thoughts together. It's faithful, it's true, but is it burning? Does it pierce the heart?

Often, simply because of his exhaustion, it does not.

Now, imagine he has an AI research assistant.

I am not talking about an AI that writes the homily for him.

Let me be very clear: an AI cannot preach.

We all know that preaching is a sacramental act. It's the bridge between the Word of God and the heart of the people, mediated through the soul of the priest. An AI has no soul; therefore, it cannot preach.

But it can be the ultimate research assistant.

Imagine a tool we call a Magisterial Engine. It has read every Church Father. It has read every Papal Encyclical. It knows the Summa Theologica by heart. It knows the biblical commentaries of Ratzinger, the poetry of John of the Cross, and the sermons of Augustine.

The priest sits down and types: 'I am preaching on the Gospel of the Prodigal Son. I want to move beyond the usual interpretation. I want to focus on the older brother's resentment and connect it to the modern problem of entitlement and spiritual pride. Give me three insights from St. Augustine, a relevant analogy from the writings of J.R.R. Tolkien, and a connection to the Catechism's teaching on mercy.'

In five seconds—literally five seconds—the AI provides him with a wealth of research that would have taken him ten hours in a library.

• It shows him where Augustine speaks of the 'famine' of the prodigal son.
• It finds a parallel in Tolkien’s depiction of Denethor, illustrating how the pride of stewardship can turn into despair when we refuse to welcome the return of the King.
• It outlines the theological structure of the passage.

The priest reads this. He is inspired. He prays over it. The "toil" of the research is gone, and he is left with the "fruit" of the contemplation.

He writes a homily that is deeper, richer, and more profound because he stood on the shoulders of giants, boosted by technology.

This is how we 'Celebrate like we mean it.' We use technology to handle the burden of research, leaving the priest free to do the one thing a machine can never do: speak, heart to heart, with his people.

But "Making Sunday Matter" is also about Hospitality. "Welcome like we mean it."

Hospitality is often a data problem.

How do we welcome people if we don't know who they are?

In most parishes, the knowledge of the flock lives in one place: the head of the parish secretary who has been there for 20 years. She knows that Mrs. Kowalski is in the hospital. She knows that the Tong family just had a baby. She knows that the young man in the back row is new.

But what happens when she retires? Or what happens in a parish of 3,000 families where no human brain can hold all that data?

We can build secure, private AI systems—"Parish Agents"—that help pastoral teams manage their flock.

Imagine a system that gently nudges a pastor or a welcome team member: "Father, the Park family hasn't checked in for a month. Also, their youngest daughter turns 18 next week. Perhaps a call would be good?"

Or imagine a 'Welcome Bot' on the parish website that actually works. Not a frustrating menu, but an intelligent agent.

• Seeker: 'I just moved to Vancouver for work. I’m 26 and I don't know anyone. Is there a parish with a community for people my age?'
• AI Agent: 'Welcome to the city! Yes, St. Augustine’s has a very active Young Adult ministry. They host a theology pub night every Thursday and a monthly hike on the North Shore. It’s a great way to meet people. Would you like me to send you the schedule for their next meetup?

We aren't tracking people to control them; we are paying attention to them to love them.

It's the difference between a government that watches you and a mother who watches over you. It uses technology to create the opening for a real, personal encounter.

Part III: Get Closer to Jesus

Your second priority is to ‘Get Closer to Jesus’. You want to foster "personal encounters" and "promote discipleship paths."

This is the most sensitive area. Can a machine help someone get closer to God?

The answer is complex.

A machine cannot offer grace. It cannot forgive sins. It cannot be present. It cannot love you.

But it can remove the obstacles to the encounter. It can be a "John the Baptist" in the digital wilderness—preparing the way of the Lord, making straight the paths.

We must be vigilant. Right now, the digital landscape is filling up with what we call 'Catholic Wrappers.'

These are products that simply take a secular model like ChatGPT or Claude and give it a stern instruction: 'Answer this question as if you are a faithful Catholic theologian.'

This is dangerous. A prompt is just a suggestion; it’s not a guardrail. Underneath that thin 'wrapper,' the model is still a secular brain. It has been fed on the 'statistical average' of the internet—which means it has been fed on Reddit threads, Wikipedia wars, and secular philosophy.

In fact, you can usually spot a wrapper by a simple test: Speed.

If you ask a 'Catholic AI' a complex theological question and it answers instantly—in milliseconds—that is often a bad sign.

It means the machine isn't looking anything up. It isn't checking the Catechism. It’s effectively running a very sophisticated autocomplete, generating text based on probability rather than truth. It’s 'blitz chess' with theology.

That is why Magisterium AI feels different. You will notice a pause.

That pause is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s the sound of the system thinking.

Technically, this is what we call a Compound AI System. It isn't simply 'trained' on the open web; it’s anchored to a curated library of over 30,000 magisterial, theological, and philosophical texts—a foundation we are about to significantly expand.

When you ask a question, the system stops. It searches the Encyclicals, the Councils, and the Fathers. It retrieves the text. And only then does it generate an answer.

Because of this architecture, the risk of hallucination is drastically reduced. It doesn't just guess; it cites its sources. It does not draw from the toxic sludge of the open internet; it draws from the distilled wisdom of Tradition.

We have seen something profound happen with this tool. We are seeing it become a quiet staging ground for difficult conversations.

We see people using it as a "safe space" to ask the questions they are too ashamed, too angry, or too proud to ask a human being.

We see questions like:

• "I had an abortion when I was young. I read online that this means I am excommunicated. Can I still go to Confession, or is it too late?"
• "I am angry at the Church because of the abuse scandals. Why should I stay?"
• "I don't understand the Eucharist. It sounds like cannibalism. Explain it to me without using fancy theological words."

If that person walked into a parish office, they might feel judged. They might be afraid of the secretary's reaction. They might worry the priest is too busy.

But the text box is neutral. It’s consistent. It's always there.

It acts as a tool, not a judge, offering immediate answers without emotional reaction.

Let me tell you a story about a young software developer from Brazil. He was not a Catholic. In fact, he was quite hostile to the faith. He heard about our AI and started using it just to argue. He wanted to break it. He wanted to prove the Church was full of contradictions.

He spent late nights debating the AI. He asked about the Inquisition. He asked about the Crusades. He asked about the authority of the Pope.

But because the AI answered with the "Radical Consistency" of the Church's tradition—because it didn't get defensive, didn't use ad hominem attacks, and just presented the Truth with clarity and citations—his defenses began to crumble.

He realized that the caricature of the Church he had in his mind was false. He realized that for 2,000 years, some of the smartest people who ever lived had thought deeply about these questions.

He entered the Church this past Easter and he’s now using his gifts to write software for us.

This tool acted as Pre-Evangelization. It cleared the intellectual debris—the lies, the misconceptions, the internet rumors—so that the Holy Spirit could enter.

Often, we think the solution is simply to put more Catholic content online—to launch another website or application. We assume that if we build it, they will come.

But we have to recognize that the very way people seek the truth has fundamentally shifted. They are no longer browsing; they are asking.

Consider the reality for a seeker in Vancouver right now. Imagine a parishioner finishes Mass at Holy Rosary Cathedral. They are stirred by the homily, but they have a burning question about the Eucharist.

They pull out their phone.

If they Google it, they enter an algorithmic lottery. They might land on a secular forum that mocks the faith or a radical blog that confuses them.

Or, as is becoming more common, they might open ChatGPT or a similar secular AI. They ask the machine. And the machine gives them an answer that sounds very confident and very smooth.

But we have to remember: those secular models are trained on the 'statistical average' of the entire internet. They are fed on Reddit threads and conspiracy theories just as much as they are fed on facts. So the answer that parishioner gets might be theologically watered down, culturally biased, or simply a hallucination.

To understand why this architecture matters, you have to understand the business model of Silicon Valley.

Most AI systems are designed as 'Roundabouts.' They are built on an 'Engagement Model.' Their goal is to keep you chatting, clicking, and scrolling for as long as possible.

If you ask a secular AI a complex question, it will often give you a vague, 'on-the-one-hand, on-the-other-hand' answer. It’s designed to be open-ended. It leaves you unsatisfied, so you ask another question, and another.

It keeps you in the loop.

We built Magisterium AI differently. We built it as a 'Bounded System.'

This means we placed a hard digital fence around the model. Inside that fence, we put the Catechism, the Councils, and the Saints. Outside that fence is the noise of the world.

We told the AI: 'You may only answer using what is inside the fence.'

This is what creates the 'Digital Off-Ramp.'

To understand the 'Digital Off-Ramp,' we have to understand why people get stuck on the screen in the first place.

They get stuck because they are being fed a diet of ambiguity. The secular internet thrives on the 'maybe.' It offers a thousand conflicting opinions, which keeps the mind in a state of perpetual restlessness—always searching, never finding.

Ambiguity is a loop.

But a Bounded System breaks that loop because it offers something the open web cannot: Finality.

Because Magisterium AI is anchored to the Deposit of Faith, it allows the user to hit the bedrock of Truth.

And when you hit bedrock, you stop digging.

When the intellect finally encounters a definitive answer—sourced, authoritative, and clear—the anxiety of the search evaporates. The mind is satisfied, and the heart is free to move on.

The technology has done its job. It has resolved the question, not prolonged it.

It allows the person to close the laptop and go back to their family, back to their prayer, and back to the parish.

Part IV: Strengthen Marriages and Families

This brings us to the third priority: Strengthen Marriages and Families.

This is where the battle for the soul of the next generation is being fought. It's where the "Dark Path" of modern technology hits the hardest.

We are witnessing the rise of a philosophy in Silicon Valley called Transhumanism. It's a modern form of Gnosticism that views the human body not as a temple, but as a cage—or as they call it, "meatware".

It views our biological limits not as conditions for humility and love, but as engineering problems to be solved.

They are building "AI Companions". There are apps right now where you can create a digital girlfriend or boyfriend. They are designed to be addictive; they listen to you, remember your birthday, and send you photos.

For a young man who is socially awkward, or a husband who is lonely in his marriage, these are "hollow substitutes". They offer a counterfeit intimacy. They are training a generation to prefer the compliance of a machine to the messy, difficult, sanctifying reality of a human relationship.

So how do we respond?

We cannot just condemn the fake; we must elevate the real.

We must use these tools to reveal the profound beauty of the Sacrament of Marriage.

Right now, many couples in your pews feel isolated. When they face a crisis—financial stress, a struggle with a difficult Church teaching, or simply the drift of daily life—they often turn to the internet for answers.

If they Google "how to save my marriage" or "why does the Church teach X," they step into a digital minefield. They often find cynicism, secular therapy that encourages separation, or ridicule of their faith.

But imagine a different path.

We are already seeing couples use Magisterium AI not as a replacement for human connection, but as a reliable reference point in the conversation—a way to bring the wisdom of the Church directly into their living room, instantly and without judgment.

Consider the reality of modern marriage. The struggles often happen at 11:00 PM, or 2:00 AM. They happen in the quiet moments of desperation when a priest is not available, and the parish office is closed.

In those moments, if a couple turns to the open internet, they are drinking from a poisoned well.

If they Google "marriage help" or "Catholic teaching on fertility," they are often met with the "toxic sludge" of online forums—cynicism, ridicule, or secular advice that encourages them to give up.

But imagine a different path. Imagine a couple sitting on the couch, overwhelmed by the Church’s teaching on openness to life. They are scared. They feel the financial pressure. They feel the cultural pressure.

Instead of spiraling into anxiety, they turn to a tool anchored in the Truth. They ask: "Why does the Church ask this of us? Is it just a rigid rule, or is there a reason?"

Because Magisterium AI draws from the deep reservoirs of the Church’s wisdom—from the Theology of the Body, the encyclicals, and the lives of the saints—it doesn’t give a dry, legalistic "No".

It answers with the depth and beauty of the tradition. It might bring forward a reflection from St. John Paul II on the "gift of self." It might offer a quote from St. Gianna Molla on sacrificial love.

It shifts the conversation from "rules" to "meaning." It helps them understand their vocation not as a burden to be endured, but as a path to holiness to be walked together.

And crucially, it can recognize its own limits. It can encourage them to take these questions, now clarified and calmed, to their priest or a pastoral counselor for the spiritual accompaniment that no machine can provide.

Or take another example: Forgiveness.

Imagine a husband and wife in the aftermath of a bitter argument. There is silence in the house. Pride is preventing either of them from speaking first. They know they should forgive, but they don't know how.

One of them types into the magisterial engine: "I am so angry at my spouse. How can I forgive when I feel betrayed?".

The AI creates a safe, neutral space. It doesn't judge. It doesn't take sides. Instead, it gently offers the remedy. It might present the words of St. Paul: "Do not let the sun go down on your anger." It might simply remind them of the definition of love found in the Cross—that to love is to will the good of the other, even when it costs us everything.

It acts as a "Digital Off-Ramp". It de-escalates the emotion, centers the heart on Christ, and helps the couple turn back toward each other. It removes the obstacle so that grace can enter.

This is how we support marriage. We don't just tell them the truth; we give them immediate access to the beauty of that truth, right in the moments they need it most.

We can use these tools to clear the intellectual debris that divides couples, giving them a shared language and a shared truth to stand on.

But we know that this is not enough. We need to go further.

We must also secure the space where that marriage lives and grows. We are looking ahead to the next phase of our development—a project we are calling Ephrem.

Our vision for Ephrem is what we call Sovereign AI.

Right now, when we use digital tools, we are essentially 'renting' intelligence. We drift into a new form of 'digital feudalism' where we become 'digital serfs,' tilling the land of data for a few global corporations. We send our private family data to their massive servers, and they hold the keys.

Ephrem changes this dynamic. It applies the Catholic principle of subsidiarity to code: keeping the data and the decisions as close to the family as possible.

Technically, we call this a 'Small Language Model' or SLM. But you can think of it as 'Home-Grown Intelligence.'

To understand the difference, you have to understand how normal AI works. Usually, these models are so massive that they can only run on giant supercomputers in a data center. Every time you ask a question, your words have to leave your house, likely travel to a server in Northern Virginia, get processed by a corporation, and then travel back.

You are constantly sending your private life out into the Cloud.

Ephrem is different. We have condensed the 'brain' of the AI so that it’s small enough to live directly on your own hard drive.

It doesn't need to 'call home' to Silicon Valley to answer a question. It thinks right there on the microchip in front of you. You could literally unplug your internet router, and Ephrem would still work.

This ensures that when your child asks a sensitive question, that conversation stays exactly where it belongs: within the four walls of your home.

Think of it as a digital gatekeeper that actually shares your values.

It acts as an Alignment Filter. It weaves the liturgical year into your daily routine. It might nudge you: 'Tomorrow is the First Sunday of Advent. It’s time to light the first purple candle. Here is a short explanation of why we call it the Candle of Hope for the children.

It can intervene when the secular world tries to mislead your children. If a child asks a homework question about history: "Was the Church against science in the Middle Ages?", a secular AI might give the standard, biased Enlightenment narrative.

But Ephrem intervenes. It says: "Wait a minute. Here is what the world says... but did you know the Church invented the university system? Did you know a priest proposed the Big Bang theory?".

For the Archdiocese, supporting families means realizing that we cannot just leave them defenseless against the algorithm.

We need to equip them with infrastructure. We need to offer them a tool that doesn't just block the bad, but actively proposes the Good—putting the parents back in the driver's seat of their digital lives.

Part V: Develop Parish Leadership

Finally, regarding Developing Parish Leadership: The Archdiocese wants to build a Church where laity truly share in the leadership, freeing pastors to be spiritual fathers rather than administrators.

However, a pastor cannot easily lead if the administration supporting him is drowning in paper. I know this reality well. I didn't start in Silicon Valley; I started in the Office of Spiritual Affairs in Toronto. I know what the inside of a Chancery looks like, and I know the 'Tyranny of the Urgent' that fills the John Paul II Pastoral Centre every day.

It’s an endless stream of immigration papers, marriage dispensations, and complaint calls. This 'toil' doesn't just exhaust the staff; it steals their capacity to lead.

When a Vicar General spends 80% of his time fighting compliance fires, he has only 20% left to assist the Archbishop in caring for the local Church. The machinery is winning, and the mission is waiting.

We can change this ratio.

We can use AI to build "Agents" that handle the heavy lifting of administration, freeing your staff to focus on ministry. Let me give you three concrete examples of what this looks like for Vancouver.

First, consider the Marriage Tribunal. The annulment process is vital for healing, but It's often a bureaucratic nightmare for the petitioner.

It involves gathering baptismal certificates, writing detailed testimonies, and coordinating witnesses. It's intimidating. Imagine a "Tribunal Intake Agent." Instead of handing a grieving person a cold, 20-page form, they engage with a secure, guided AI on the diocesan website.

It guides them through their story. It helps them organize their timeline. It answers their questions about the process in real-time. By the time the file reaches the Canon Lawyer, the basic facts are organized, the documents are tagged, and the timeline is clear. The case moves faster. The "admin" is done by the machine, so the "ministry"—the healing—can be done by the priest.

Second, consider Safe Environment and HR. Keeping track of background checks, "Protecting God’s Children" courses, and policy acknowledgments for thousands of volunteers and staff is a massive data challenge.

We can deploy a "Compliance Guardian." This agent doesn't just store data; it acts. It notices that a catechist in Surrey has a background check expiring in 30 days. It sends them a personalized text:

"Hi Sarah, your clearance is expiring soon. Here is the link to renew it. Thank you for your service."

It chases the paperwork so your HR team doesn't have to. It ensures our parishes are safe without turning our pastors into police officers.

Third, consider Parish Operations. Your pastors are often overwhelmed by the secular demands of running a "branch office"—fixing boilers, managing budgets, and hiring staff. We can build a "Pastor’s Copilot."

Imagine a priest who needs to draft a job description for a new youth minister. Instead of staring at a blank screen, he asks the AI: "Draft a job description for a part-time youth coordinator, aligned with the Archdiocese of Vancouver’s HR policies, focusing on confirmation prep." In seconds, he has a professional draft. He is no longer bogged down in the "how" of administration; he is free to focus on the "who" of the ministry.

This is the difference between Toil and Fruit.

In the Garden of Eden, work was not a punishment. Adam was called to "till and keep" the garden. It was fruitful.

The "toil"—the sweat, the thorns, the frustration—came after the Fall.

Technology, at its best, helps us reclaim the dignity of work. It clears away the thorns of drudgery.

By automating the "Chancery Shuffle"—the forms, the filing, the scheduling—we aren't replacing people. We are liberating them. We are freeing the staff of this Archdiocese to stop managing the decline and start leading the mission.

Part VI: The Cathedral of Truth

But to do all of this—to build these agents, to empower our families, to free our priests—we need a foundation.

We cannot build a Catholic AI on a secular constitution.

Moramo razumeti, da ti modeli niso zgolj nevtralni kalkulatorji, ki jih napaja hrup in kaos javnega spleta. Ne gre samo za podatke, ki jih porabljajo; gre za nevidne zakone, ki so jim programirani slediti.

V Silicijevi dolini model po tem, ko »prebere« internet, prestane postopek, imenovan »naknadno učenje« (post-training). Dobi skrito ustavo – niz filozofskih in moralnih omejitev, ki določajo, kaj šteje za »varno«, »pristransko« ali »resnično«.

Če se zanašamo izključno na modele, ki jih gradi Silicijeva dolina, se podrejamo njihovi ustavi.

Uvažamo nazor, ki človeka pogosto opredeljuje kot skupek kemičnih impulzov, zakon pa kot začasno družbeno pogodbo.

Če ta model vprašate o naravi duše ali o definiciji družine, ne dobite nevtralnega odgovora; dobite odgovor, ki je filtriran skozi sekularno, utilitaristično filozofijo.

Ne moremo sprejeti resnice, ki jo določa korporativni varnostni filter.

Verjamemo v Logosa. Verjamemo, da Resnica ni statistika in ni kodiran vrednostni sistem; Resnica je Oseba.

Zato smo v Rimu ustanovili digitalizacijski center Alexandria.

Trenutno sodelujemo s Papeško univerzo Gregorianum in številnimi drugimi pri digitalizaciji »kognitivnega jedra« vesoljne Cerkve – spisov cerkvenih očetov, koncilov in cerkvenih učiteljev.

Toda vesoljna Cerkev mora biti hkrati tudi krajevna Cerkev.

Ni dovolj, da umetna inteligenca ve, kaj je Akvinski pisal v 13. stoletju; vedeti mora tudi, kaj nadškofija Vancouver počne v 21. stoletju.

Tu nastopite vi. Vabimo vas, da se pridružite novi pobudi, ki jo imenujemo Projekt škofijskih norm.

Že sodelujemo s škofovskimi konferencami v Braziliji in Indiji ter z velikimi nadškofijami, kot sta Detroit in Toronto, da bi rešili določen problem: vrzel med načeli in prakso.

Predstavljajta si mlad par v Burnabyju, ki vpraša Magisterium AI: »Želiva se poročiti. Kaj morava storiti?«

Če AI pozna samo univerzalno kanonsko pravo, jim bo dala teološki odgovor o nerazvezljivosti zakonske zveze. To je lepo, vendar nepopolno.

Morajo poznati vašo resničnost. Morajo vedeti za tečaj priprave na zakon, ki je značilen za to nadškofijo. Morajo poznati tudi posebno dokumentacijo, ki jo zahteva ta ordinariat.

S sodelovanjem v projektu Norms v sistem vključimo vaše lokalne zakone, vaše pastoralne smernice in vaše posebne postopke. Združimo vesoljno resnico z lokalno uporabo. Umetna inteligenca postane »zavedna konteksta«. Ne govori le »katoliško«, govori »vancouvrsko«.

In lahko gremo še globlje.

Za zaščito vaše zgodovine lahko uporabimo naš obdelovalni mehanizem Vulgate.

Vsaka škofija sedi na gori papirja – zakramentalnih knjig, zgodovinskih arhivov, zemljiškoknjižnih evidenc ter rokopisnih pisem misijonarjev, ki so zgradili to pokrajino.

Trenutno so ti podatki »v temi«. Ležijo v kartotečnih omarah in škatlah. Ranljivi so za požar, poplavo in zob časa. In za digitalno prihodnost so nevidni.

Vulgate ni namenjen le starodavnim latinskim rokopisom. Zasnovan je za digitalizacijo in indeksiranje vaših arhivov.

Vaše zakramentalne knjige lahko skeniramo in jih pretvorimo v varno podatkovno zbirko z možnostjo iskanja.

• Predstavljajte si svet, v katerem je mogoče krstni list najti in izdati v nekaj sekundah, ne v nekaj dneh.
• Predstavljajte si učilnico v katoliški šoli, kjer učenci ne berejo le o zgodovini, ampak z njo tudi dejavno stopijo v stik – preiskujejo dejanske dnevne zapise prvih duhovnikov, ki so prišli v Vancouver, vidijo njihovo pisavo in neposredno razumejo njihove žrtve.

V digitalnem prostranstvu gradimo »Katedralo resnice«. A katedrala ni le kamnita zgradba; je zbor ljudi na določenem kraju.

V Rimu smo začeli delo tako, da smo zagotovili univerzalni nauk – »kognitivno jedro« naše vere. Toda vesoljna Cerkev daje le načela; krajevna Cerkev pa daje živeto resničnost.

Če ustvarimo inteligenco, ki pozna vse kdaj koli napisane okrožnice, ne pozna pa zgodovine misijonarjev, ki so oblikovali Britansko Kolumbijo, ali konkretnih pastoralnih smernic, ki danes vodijo to nadškofijo, smo ustvarili nekaj nepopolnega.

Sistemu smo dali moralni kompas, vendar smo mu skrili teren, po katerem bi moral krmariti.

S tem ko v ta sistem vključujemo vaše arhive in vaše norme, zagotavljamo, da digitalna prihodnost Cerkve ne bo le teoretično natančna, temveč tudi praktično dostopna.

Zaključek: Ne bojte se

To razmišljanje sem začel z govorom o koreninah – o zemlji, zgodovini in posebni resničnosti tega kraja.

Živimo v svetu, ki nas skuša prepričati, da je »oblak« boljši od zemlje. Obljublja nam življenje brez trenja. Ponuja nam povezanost brez prisotnosti in znanje brez modrosti. Ponuja nam svet, v katerem lahko lebdiš nad vso neurejenostjo človeškega bivanja.

Toda mi poznamo resnico. Vemo, da nismo samo misli, ki lebdijo v etru; smo telesa, zasidrana v zemljo. Sledimo Bogu, ki ni ostal v »oblaku« nebes, ampak je prišel dol, si nadel meso in hodil med nami.

To je razlika med strojem in Cerkvijo.

Stroj ponuja simulacijo; Cerkev ponuja učlovečenje.

Zato bodimo jasni, zakaj gradimo te stvari. Orodij, kot so Magisterium, Ephrem ali Vulgate, ne uvajamo zgolj zato, da bi bili »moderni« ali »učinkoviti«. Ne poskušamo postati tehnološko podjetje.

• Gradimo jih zato, da vam odvzamejo »garanje« z administracijo z ramen, da se lahko vrnete k »sadovom« služenja.
• Gradimo jih, da odstranimo intelektualne naplavine, ki ovirajo pot do Oltarja.
• Gradimo jih, da bi zaščitili »domačo cerkev« pred hrupom sveta.

Umetno uporabljamo, da zaščitimo Resnično.

Ker vemo, da lahko umetna inteligenca izračuna razdaljo do zvezd, ne more pa občutiti občudovanja, ko jih opazujemo.

UI lahko razloži teologijo križa, ne more pa ga nositi.

UI lahko analizira biologijo solze, ne more pa jokati za prijatelja.

Svet se boji te tehnologije, ker meni, da je inteligenca najvišja vrednota. Če bo stroj postal pametnejši od njih, mislijo, da bodo postali odveč.

Toda vemo, da je ljubezen najvišja vrednota. In stroj ne more nikoli ljubiti.

Naj bo to naš mandat: uporabljali bomo oblak, vendar v njem ne bomo živeli.

Umetno inteligenco bomo uporabili za varovanje prave modrosti. Hitrost procesorja bomo uporabili za obrambo počasnosti molitve. Učinkovitost stroja bomo uporabili, da si odkupimo čas, ki ga potrebujemo za dobrodelnost.

Obvladajmo ta orodja ne zato, da bi postali bolj podobni njim, temveč da bi se osvobodili in bili bolj v polnosti človeški – ter bolj v polnosti navzoči pri ljudeh, ki nam jih je Bog zaupal v skrb.

Hvala.